On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:00:45AM +0200, Josef Reidinger wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:12:05 +0200 > Martin Vidner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Have you considered going all the way and packaging our repos as > > gems? You know, gemspec, gem2rpm, rpm. > > > > Maybe the parts with C++, cough Perl cough, would be harder, but it > > should be easy for pure Ruby, once we conform to the conventions as > > proposed above. > > > > I think the benefit would be that bundler could set up things that > > we now need to do in VMs. > > Yes, we [have] consider[ed] it and [the] reason why not [use gems] is still > [the] same. A yast module > contain beside lib also other parts like clients, modules, autoyast > schemas and others, which cannot be packaged as gem, as we cannot get > them into correct location.
Yes, but these are all part of a YaST API that we control, so we could amend core and ruby-bindings to look in new gem-style paths. Are there paths that we do not control? - desktop files - ...? -- Martin Vidner, YaST Team http://en.opensuse.org/User:Mvidner Kuracke oddeleni v restauraci je jako fekalni oddeleni v bazenu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
