On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:20:41AM -0600, Suresh K Hosamani wrote:
> Need urgent help on this, by next week I need to be ready for the first iso.

Hi Suresh,

I am sorry, for the delay, I've had several meetings in the past days.

> >>> "Suresh K Hosamani" <[email protected]> 8/16/16 2:48 PM >>>
> Hi Martin,
>  
> You can access the content of iso at 
> http://164.99.103.82/download/au/sles12_ruby_packages_without_patterns/
>  
> What I understood from the code is, every proposal module gets the 
> "rich_text_title", "menu_title" and "id" from modulename_proposal.rb file, 
>  
> Ex.     elsif @func == "Description"
>           # Determine if we should be in the proposal screen or not.
>           @force_proposal = Ops.get_boolean(@param, "force_proposal", false)
>           @isSelected = NovellPatterns.IsPatternInstalled("novell-sms") # 
> FIXME: is this needed anymore?
>           @isSelected = @isSelected && 
> NovellAddonInstall.IsProductSelected("sms")
>           Builtins.y2milestone("Proposal:IsSelected:novell-sms: %1", 
> @isSelected)
>           if @isSelected || @force_proposal
>                 @ret = {
>                   # Rich text title for Sms in proposals
>                   "rich_text_title" => _(
>                         "Storage Management Services (SMS)"
>                   ),
>                   # Menu title for Sms in proposals
>                   "menu_title"         => _(
>                         "&Storage Management Services (SMS)"
>                   ),
>                   "id"                         => "sms"
>                 }
>           else
>                 @ret = {}
>           end
>         # write the proposal
> In my case, since the pattern is not installed, proposal module is not 
> returning  "rich_text_title", "menu_title" and "id", so its considering the 
> modulename_proposal as the rich_text_title and creating a link as module_1 
> module_2 etc..
>  
> Note: Since OES is not yet ready on SLES12, I am using OES2015SP1 (on 
> sles11sp4) and installing by breaking the dependencies.

OK, I am now installing the above URL as an add-on to SLES12-SP2
RC1. I had to ignore many RPM dependencies in the installation
proposal. I also had to ignore a missing package signing key about
100 times :-/ so the next time I should install with "insecure"
flag.

I have finally reproduced the problem.
I have filed it as https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994127

-- 
Martin Vidner, YaST Team
http://en.opensuse.org/User:Mvidner

Kuracke oddeleni v restauraci je jako fekalni oddeleni v bazenu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to