On 10/04/2016 01:02 PM, Ancor Gonzalez Sosa wrote:
> On 10/04/2016 12:50 PM, Josef Reidinger wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:19:47 +0200
>> Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> My suggestion, start using 3.2.X for master. We can correct the
>>> already released packages not using that versioning schema. They
>>> shouldn't be many.
>>>
>>> So the solution would look like this(for the yast2-packager example)
>>>
>>> SLE-12-SP2 (SP2 in OBS) -> 3.1.118, 3.1.119...
>>> master (TW in OBS) -> 3.2.1, 3.2.2...
>>> merge_after_release (Leap and SP2:Update) -> 3.1.117.1, 3.1.117.2...
>>
>> this is wrong, as SP2 have higher number then merge_after_release. What
>> abou 3.1.117.1 reserved for SP2 and 3.1.118 for merge_after_release?
> 
> Yes, that obviously makes much more sense. I was just writing from the
> top of my mind, without thinking it twice.
> 
>> in general I agree with 3.2.* versioning jump. ( just keep it in mind
>> when dumping master )
>>
>>>
>>> Changes introduced in SLE-12-SP2 should also be merged in
>>> merge_after_release (producing a new number there) and the final merge
>>> after release should bump the number to follow the SLE-12-SP2 series.
>>
>> I think that better way is to merge merge_after_release to SP2 branch
>> and use its new higher number. Also I expect that all fixes in SP2 will
>> be in Leap, so all changes in SP2 have to be in merge_after_release.
> 
> Yes, as said. Makes more sense.

And next question is, what will be release through self-update?
Everything from the merge_after_release branches will be published in
the self-update repo? Just asking, I don't see a reason to not do it.

For example, I already have a trivial fix for this yast-bootloader bug
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000629 I plan to merge it in
merge_after_release and master... and it looks exactly as the kind of
things we created self-update for.

Cheers.
-- 
Ancor González Sosa
YaST Team at SUSE Linux GmbH
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to