V Sun, 5 Jan 2020 11:51:29 +0100 Ancor Gonzalez Sosa <an...@suse.de> napsáno:
> On 1/3/20 12:24 PM, Ancor Gonzalez Sosa wrote: > > On 1/3/20 11:31 AM, Josef Reidinger wrote: > >> V Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:14:15 +0100 > >> > >> Hi, this is quite interesting. Especially similarities in testing looks > >> nice. I have few questions: > > > > I have to say that my feeling is that similarities in testing are not as > > deep as they may look in the surface. Tests in Crystal use almost > > exactly the same syntax that RSpec, but AFAIK there is nothing like > > "let" and nothing like rspec-mocks. > > Good news, I added Spectator[1] to the project and now both test files > disk_size_test.rb and disk_size_spec.cr are basically identical. > > The Spectator home page claims that "developers coming from Ruby and > RSpec will feel right at home" and I must say it's absolutely true. > > Cheers. > > [1] https://gitlab.com/arctic-fox/spectator Good to heard that. Then maybe we can try for some serious usage took the most compute intensive part of yast2-storage-ng ( I think computing proposal is the winner now, not? ) and try to write it in crystal. When I think about it, it probably need two input - current state + configuration ( defaults + product specific changes + maybe user changes from guided setup integrated together? ) and return the proposed action to apply on graph ( or target graph, but I worry it cannot be easily import to libstorage-ng ). And when we have it compare speed. I think the task is good also because it can be well paralleled and we already reach its limit in some bug reports. Josef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: yast-devel+ow...@opensuse.org
