On 1/28/20 12:01 PM, Kenneth Wimer wrote: >> I'd probably really expect >> >> - To see only disks, when I click on Hard Disks >> - To go directly to partitions when selecting a disk >> - To see Volumes when selecting a LV instead of seeing overview > > While I agree, this highlights the fact that without more information > (use-cases/epics, POC’s, reviews, tests) it is rnearly impossible to > create the best solution. Do we look at the larger scope and do this > right or do we implement singular feature requests based on > over-specific user stories? Even with just this one change there is a > lack of user information and/or testing. Waiting for bug reports as > “testing” has proven to not be an effective method of understanding our > true user-bases’s needs.
Absolutely. And that's the reason why we decided to re-evaluate big topics from time to time. This is a perfect example. We often try to implement things in a way that fits the rest of the tool, but we lack real use-cases anyway. We do have a review, we do have testing, we blog about it, but we mostly get only bugreports as a feedback if at all. So, let's take this as an opportunity. We have learned the hard way :) but we have actually learned something good. - Understanding is the key here - Use-cases are a must - Usability review is a must - Feedback from outside is really appreciated - We should keep blogging, but it's not enough Thx Lukas -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: yast-devel+ow...@opensuse.org
