On 31. 03. 20 16:39, Ladislav Slezak wrote:
> Dne 31. 03. 20 v 8:59 Jiri Srain napsal(a):
>
>> It is even worse: The self-update is not limited to YaST packages (you
>> can update
>> any part of inst-sys). There the version scheme will fail (unless you
>> introduce
>> way more logic).
>
> We could check only some specific YaST packages.
>
> (Actually that's already implemented in the existing downgrade check,
> we compare the versions only for some white-listed YaST packages, we do
> not care
> about the others.)
>
>> If you work this idea a bit further, this is perhaps something that
>> could also
>> work with the quarterly re-spins (you could distinguish which package
>> should apply
>> to which quarterly release even if they are all in the same repository).
>
> Yes, but you would need to add it to *every* package, even to non-YaST
> packages,
> that would be a bit more difficult to enforce...
Or not. You could turn this Provides into an API to the maintenance team
telling them that the update is supposed to go to a self-update :-)
This would be something for longer discussion with maintenance, though.
Jiri
--
Regards,
Jiri Srain
Project Manager
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o. e-mail: jsr...@suse.com
Krizikova 148/34 tel: +420 284 084 659
186 00 Praha 8 fax: +420 284 084 001
Czech Republic http://www.suse.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: yast-devel+ow...@opensuse.org
