On 2020-03-30 22:07, josef Reidinger wrote:
> Hi,

> 
> Or do we have some functionality that we would like to have on top of 
> standard parsers?

I think it makes sense to offer our own parser. Otherwise, we could end
up with different parts of YaST using different approaches (rexml vs
nokogiri vs next-ruby-thing vs whatever-python provides). That's
specially bad because each parser comes with its own mindset.

> Only thing that current parser have on top of generic xml parsers is 
> understandingof type attribute

Which is something that is, on itself, enough to justify the creation of
a YaST parser (internally based on an existing solution, of course).

Cheers.
-- 
Ancor González Sosa
YaST Team at SUSE Linux GmbH
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: yast-devel+ow...@opensuse.org

Reply via email to