THERE IS NOTHING HONEST AND TRUTHFUL IN YOUR CRITICISM OF THE ANC

By: Kaizer Mohau

I have come to conclude without any doubt that indeed the middle
strata is not a class but an inconsistent vacillating strata –
depending on the balance of forces in the body politic.

It will be remembered that prior to the ANC’s Polokwane conference in
December of 2007 – some individual so-called political analysists,
commentators, journalists and media houses pronounced on their choice
of leadership that the African National Congress should elect at the
end of its own conference.

Reasons were stated as to lobby for a certain collective of leadership
– that must come out of the conference to lead the ANC. Some of these
reasons include the theory of “investor confidence”, a theory that has
become a buzzword used to criticise other leaders to whom the media
and its thinking army of soothsayers of doom- do not like or
appreciate.

Very interesting, even though our Democratic Breakthrough has always
been warned against taking a direction that will affect negatively the
confidence those foreign investors have in our country and our
economy. In the face of it this argument is a correct one in the sense
that our country cannot operate as an Island isolated from the broad
“global” economy and politics – but a closer look into this debate
provide us with a number of analytical realities.

Firstly, those advancing this debate with passion as does Allister
Sparks, the Star, Wednesday, 29 April 2009 – where in which Sparks
argues the following: “ Zuma dare not do anything to frighten away
what little investment may be around, which would make a situation
worse – economic survival has to be the name of the game”.

There are two realities we can deduct from Allister Sparks’ view – one
is that Allister Sparks seem to have long started to write an autopsy
of our democratic dispensation before the democratic elections of
2009. As part of those who wanted a certain set of leadership and
failed in their coup’detat against the ANC, Sparks and his colleagues
in the industry of public opinion making – developed this negative
view about our country after the ANC conference and after their horse
failed to win.

So, by saying things might be worse for our country at the level of
the economy – is extreme and an indication of an intention to want to
impose on the ANC the kind of leaders the likes of Sparks prefers.

Allister Sparks, further exposes himself as one of the most Anti
Communists whose fears  of Stalinism lead them to see danger in
anything that is red –

By trying to warn the ANC and its President against the appointment of
leaders from the South African Communist Party and COSATU into the new
government Sparks makes it clear that his fears are not based on his
so called journalistic ethics and analysis but purely on his
ideological orientation – in fact Sparks want us to believe that the
South African economy under the previous regime was better as compared
to what the SACP and COSATU can contribute in the unfolding
development of our economy and our country.

Sparks is very superficial in his views – because he does not provide
his readers with a better alternative in terms of avoiding the “worse”
– this is because his analysis are clouded by his passionate hatred of
the democratic movement, thus making such pathetic conclusions about
our country.

In his article in the abovementioned edition of the Star newspaper,
Sparks’ introduction begins with his negative givings about Cde Jacob
Zuma who is the President elect of the Republic and the current
President of the African National Congress.

Sparks argues the following: “ Although I still have serious
misgivings about Jacob Zuma as our new President, about the gravity of
the corruption charges against him that have not been tested in court,
about the questionable and possibly illegal manner in which they were
withdrawn at the last minute, and about some of the things he has had
to say about the constitutional court, I must hand it to the man: he
is a formidable fighter.”

Sparks further argues as follows: “ Four – and – a – half years ago,
when he was facing that potentially devastating charge of rape in
addition to the array of fraud and corruption allegations that had
sent his close collaborator Schabir Shaik to prison, Zuma looked like
a dead man walking”.

For me it is this part of Allister Sparks vitriolic attacks on the ANC
President that seem to be the premise from which Sparks derives his
analysis and conclusions about the future of our country under the
current leadership of our movement.

Allister Sparks like many of his friends- lacks the audacity and
decency - to articulate their views objectively without serious
contradictions.

If indeed Sparks is concerned about all the things he said, especially
the issue of the so-called corruption charges which he says were not
tested in court, why does he raise the rape issue which was tested in
court and found to be not true?

Sparks mentioned the issue of the withdrawal of corruption charges
against the ANC President – in which he has the believe that charges
were illegally withdrawn – but he does not tell (us) his readers as to
what constitutes and illegal element in the decision taken by the
National Prosecuting Authority.

Sparks knows that Prosecutors are the once who are taking people to
court – to prosecute them – now what does he mean that the charges
were never in court when the very people who are supposed to take the
matter to court says, there is no legal or prosecutorial need for
that?

Sparks accuses the ANC President of having said some disturbing
statements about the constitutional court which according to Sparks
and his fellow soothsayers of doom – should never be subjected to any
kind of criticism – but Sparks again accuses Prosecutors of acting
illegally in withdrawing charges – who said Sparks is the only one
with the right to criticise our democratic institutions?

Perhaps, we should naturally be able to tell Allister Sparks that what
you can and should be doing is to speculate on issues including the
question of who will the ANC appoint in what position – by going
further than what you are able to do will definitely cost you a lot
including the respect some young journalists and analysists  except me
have for you.


By: Kaizer Mohau
Ikageng
Potchefstroom
North west province

072 080 2824

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to