Hi All, 
  
Please forward to all. 
  
1 year ago Antoinette Pietersen work for SEFA on the EIA and is now working for 
Ferret Mining & Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd to amend the EIA for CRG. 
When the community requests information, it is not forthcoming, a year latter, 
information is again requested by the Federation for a Sustainable Environment 
on behalf of Our Communities and again with a new CRG CEO, information is not 
made available to the public upon request. 
The question (Social License) then is to the South African Community: 
1.               What Strategy has been Developed by CRG; 
2.               Is Apartheid Experience post 1994 being used; 
3.               Why was the Water Use not included in first application??? 
  
  

From:             "Antoinette Pietersen" <[email protected]> 
To:                  "Mark Biggars" <[email protected]> 
CC:                 "Jenny Johnson" <[email protected]>, 
"Andrew Barker" <[email protected]> 
Date:               Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:41:09 +0200 
Subject:           RE: Closing Comments for CRG-SA Final Report 
  
Dear Mark 
  
Thanks you for your comments. We will make the final EMP available upon request 
to the public. I will include your valuable issues in the final report. 
  
Once again, many thanks for your enthusiasm and the valuable local knowledge 
that you have contributed throughout this process. 
  
Warm regards 
Antoinette 



  
From:             Mark Biggars [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent:               12 February 2008 02:07 PM 
To:                  [email protected] 
Cc:                  Antoinette Pietersen; Milicent Solomons; 
[email protected]; [email protected] 
Subject:          Request for Documentation. 



  
From:             Antoinette Pietersen [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent:               14 February 2008 08:57 AM 
To:                  Andrew Barker; Jenny Johnson; Megann Outram; 
[email protected]; Kenneth Kunene 
Cc:                  Mike Sullivan; Tim van Stormbroek; Erika van der Linde; 
Rudy Boer 
Subject:          FW: Request for Documentation. 
  
Dear Team 
  
It may be good to develop a strategy on how to deal with this email below. 
Based on our experience, it is important to deal with this sensitively. I am 
available should you need any assistance: 
  
Warm regards 
Antoinette 



  
From:             Jenny Johnson 
Sent:               Thursday, 14 February 2008 12:05 PM
To:                  Riccardo Vittino
Subject:          Mark Biggars Letter 
  
Hi Ric 
  
Marks letter FYI 
  
Kind regards 
  
Jenny 



  
From:             Riccardo Vittino 
[mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent:               14 February 2008 12:31
To:                  Greg James
Subject:          FW: Mark Biggars Letter 
  
Hi Greg, 
  
See below letter from Mark. 



  
From:             Greg James [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent:               14 February 2008 06:04 PM
To:                  [email protected]
Cc:                  [email protected]; Mike Sullivan; Riccardo 
Vittino 
Subject:          FW: Mark Biggars Letter 
  
Hi Gayton 
  
What are we doing about, pls provide me with a full explanation. 
  
rgds 
  
Greg 



  
From:             "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent:               Friday, April 24, 2009 5:56 PM 
To:                  "'Mark Biggars'" <[email protected]>, 
[email protected]  
Subject:          FW: FINAL REQUEST FOR APPROVED EMP 
  
From:                         [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent:               Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:33 PM
To:                  '[email protected]'
Cc:                  'Johan du Toit'; 'Jenny Johnson (Head Office)'; 
'[email protected]'
Subject:          FINAL REQUEST FOR APPROVED EMP 
Importance:   High 
  
Dear Antoinette,  
  
I refer to the appended invitation to participate in the amendment of the 
approved Environmental Management Program of Central Rand Gold. 
  
Regrettably, my request, in terms of the provisions of the Promotion of Access 
to Information Act, No 2 of 2000, for the approved Environmental Management 
Plan, which I have submitted in the prescribed format on the 8th of March, 2009 
to Mr. Johan du Toit, the CEO of CRG, was refused.  As you may reflect, in 
terms of the PAIA, the failure by CRG to respond within 30 days constitutes a 
refusal.  
  
We are of the opinion  that the public participation process for the amendment 
of the approved EMP will be  fatally flawed, procedurally unfair and 
unreasonable and will lead to conflict and legal review under the Promotion of 
Administrative Justice Act, 3 of 2000 (“PAJA”) since we were refused access to 
the approved EMP. 
  
For the sake of clarity we wish to make the following statement of what we 
believe to be the basis, inter alia, for a process that will lead to meaningful 
and effective participation. These are by no means exhaustive and include, but 
are not limited to the following:  
1.                  Sufficient information must be provided to I&AP’s in order 
to enable them to tender helpful informed advice and comment. 
2.                  All the relevant documentation must be made available to 
I&AP’s for comment, particularly the approved EMP which CRG intends to amend. 
3.                  We, as the I&AP’s will not be in the position to comment 
meaningfully on the amendment without full and exact knowledge of the contents 
of the approved EMP. 
  
I respectfully request you to please include this e-mail and appended document 
entitled “Request for Access to Record Central Rand Gold” in the comments 
received from I&AP’s in terms of the Public Participation Process. 
  
Sincerely yours, 
  
Mariette Liefferink. 
  
CEO:  FEDERATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT. 



      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to