Zelaya has been on Al Jazeera and Telesur live for a couple hours now. He is at the border, but "briefly" (I didn't see it) stepped foot (literally) into Honduras and then retreated back to Nicaragua. That's what the Al Jazeera reporters said earlier, but now they are interviewing him and he is saying that where he is IS Honduran soil. I couldn't say. Suffice it to say that, no matter what side of the border he's on, the army is not far away preventing him from going any further. Zelaya says he is "waiting for his family" to arrive before proceding further, but insists he is in Honduras.
Meanwhile, continuing to expose the U.S.' true stance (and role) in the coup in Honduras, Hillary Clinton says Zelaya is "reckless" because his action (trying to cross the border) "risks provoking violence." But Zelaya came to the border unarmed, and was met with a huge contingent of the Honduran Armed Forces (emphasis on "armed"). Why didn't Clinton renounce *them* for provoking violence? By what right do they prevent a citizen of Honduras (much less the elected President) from re-entering the country? *Not a word* from Clinton against the *golpistas* and their arms, the real source of potential violence in the situation. Sent via my BlackBerry Device from Vodacom - let your email find you! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You are subscribed. This footer can help you. Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message. You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership. To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] . -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
