All I can say as a proud member and leader within Structures of the YCLSA is
that; the National Secretary of the YCLSA could not have said it any better
it is a revolutionary analysis and the argument as well is so rich!

On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Dominic Tweedie
<[email protected]>wrote:

> ANC Today, 4 September 2009
>
>
> VIEWPOINT | BY BUTI MANAMELA
>
> *The national question and nation-building***
>
>
> The issues of nation-formation and nation-building will remain in our
> society for a while given the fact that racism was and still is, rooted in
> all institutions of society. However, the resolution of the national
> question cannot remain a permanent feature of our society. If this were to
> be the case, the historic mission and mandate of the National Liberation
> Movement (NLM) would be defeated, mainly because it is about attaining a
> non-racial, non-sexist and democratic society.
>
> The 2007 Strategy and Tactics document of the ANC says:
>
> "The main content of the National Democratic Revolution (NDR) is the
> liberation of Africans in particular and Blacks in general from political
> and socio-economic bondage." It goes further to declare that this, "…means
> uplifting the quality of life of all South Africans, especially the poor,
> the majority of whom are African and female."
>
> It is important to emphasise that the target for the NDR is the poor
> because the objective of our struggle is to unite all the oppressed in our
> country for the formation of one nation.
>
> The 1969 ANC Morogoro Conference succinctly confirmed the need for the
> unity of the oppressed and their drive towards defeating Apartheid in the
> following lines:
>
> "The African…is not the only oppressed national group in South Africa. The
> two million strong Coloured community and three-quarter million Indians
> suffer varying forms of national humiliation, discrimination and oppression.
> They are part of the non-white base upon which rests white privilege. As
> such they constitute an integral part of the social forces ranged against
> white supremacy. Despite deceptive and, often, meaningless concessions they
> share a common fate with their African brothers and their own liberation is
> inextricably bound up with the liberation of the African people."
>
> The objective linked to this is not only the defeat of white supremacy, but
> also that if we were to advance nation building and nation formation - we
> also have the task of "…liberating the white community from the false
> ideology of racial superiority and the insecurity attached to oppressing
> others". It is important to note that this is not merely a tactical
> consideration but a strategic objective to liberate the most oppressed of
> all "in the league of the oppressed" whilst in the process "liberating the
> oppressor".
>
> "But none of this detracts from the basically national context of our
> liberation drive. In the last resort it is only the success of the national
> democratic revolution which - by destroying the existing social and economic
> relationships - will bring with it a correction of the historical injustices
> perpetrated against the indigenous majority and thus lay the basis for a new
> - and deeper internationalist - approach." (Morogoro: 1969)
>
> Therefore, the attainment of a national democratic society can only lie in
> the destruction of Apartheid's social and economic relations and the
> continued existence of such relations. There are clear signs that the form
> and content of our national democratic revolution is still facing a long
> path towards attainment.
>
> Historically, the twin threats to this strategic objective in our society
> and our movement have been "white racism" on the one hand; and narrow
> African chauvinism on the other hand. These twin threats have always
> manifested themselves in the super-structural institutions of our society.
> It would be suicidal to deny the continued presence of racism in our
> society, but even more dangerous for the attainment of national unity and
> nation-formation is the denial of narrow African chauvinism.
>
> The danger of these twin threats is articulated in Nelson Mandela's famous
> Statement from the Dock:
>
> "I have fought against white domination, and I have fought against black
> domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in
> which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It
> is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve. But if needs be, it is
> an ideal for which I am prepared to die."
>
> These twin threats are not on an equal pedestal. The dominant contradiction
> that faces our society is national contradiction, whilst the fundamental one
> is class contradiction. Emphasis should also be made that the reason why we
> need to deal with both in almost equal terms is that the narrow African
> chauvinism is not an effective tool of defeating racism, but can also act to
> reinforce racial tensions as people may withdraw into their racial cocoons.
>
> In essence, the task of "liberation of Africans in particular and blacks in
> general" lies in the success of the movement in using the platform of
> building a non-racial society. The two, meaning, the task and the platform,
> are mutually inclusive and interconnected and failure to maintain this
> interconnection exposes the inability to
> overcome white racism, on the one hand, and black chauvinism, on the other.
>
> Let us look at both threats each in turn. In our society there still exists
> white racism that we should confront, expose and deal with. The figures
> released by Commission on Employment Equity (CEE) shows that white people
> occupy 74% of senior positions in the private sector. This is a serious
> indictment on white capital's commitment to honour their role in
> nation-building and nation-formation.
>
> Fraught race relations will remain for some time in a nation where
> everything, from division of labour, composition of national sporting teams,
> political preferences, cultural preferences and every social facet of our
> life was historically determined on the basis of race. We need to intensify
> progressive nationalism and ensure that it triumphs against this.
>
> This means affirming blacks in the economy, changing the division of labour
> at both junior and senior level in both the public and private sector;
> transforming social relations in education, access to health, shelter and
> also ensuring that we begin to confront problems of equality and wealth
> distribution by breaking the back of racism and racial exclusion.
>
> Narrow African chauvinism is a tendency and dangerous phenomenon of seeking
> to redefine the objective of the movement at different periods as
> installation of African majoritarianism. The National Liberation Movement
> has always been able to transcend beyond this narrow perception and
> strategic objective of the NDR as it recognised that ours is Colonialism of
> a Special Type.
>
> Those who held this "elitist" view always combined their narrow objective
> with an anti-communist agenda that sought to isolate and distinguish between
> "white revolutionaries and white reactionaries". This elitist tendency has
> always hid its narrow objective under the veil of seeking to represent the
> interests of the black majority. The tendency emerged with the breakaway of
> the PAC from the ANC by Leballo; the expulsion of the Group of Eight
> immediately after the Morogoro Conference; and now recently, the breakaway
> by Shikota. (For more on this, see Mavimbela's article titled "The Shikota
> Phenomenon - A Counter-Revolutionary Tendency").
>
> Thus, the Strategy and Tactics of the ANC from Morogoro declared that:
>
> "Those belonging to the other oppressed groups and those few white
> revolutionaries who show themselves ready to make common cause with our
> aspirations, must be fully integrated on the basis of individual equality.
> Approached in the right spirit these two propositions do not stand in
> conflict but reinforce one another. Equality of participation in our
> national front does not mean a mechanical parity between the various
> national groups."
>
> It further went on to declare that the "Coloured and Indian people have
> often in the past, by their actions, shown that they form part of the broad
> sweep towards liberation."
>
> Morogoro further declared the elitist nature of those who opposed the main
> content of the NDR by declaring that "our nationalism must not be confused
> with chauvinism or narrow nationalism of a previous epoch. It must not be
> confused with the classical drive by an elitist group among the oppressed
> people to gain ascendancy so that they can replace the oppressor in the
> exploitation of the mass."
>
> This tendency can only lead to, and may even strike concessions for, either
> modernised forms of black or white Bantustans . They may not see the need to
> break the barriers, economic or political that is entrenched in many
> localities in our country. They may even seek to promote some of these
> tendencies. The main reason why it would seek to do so would be to lazily
> assume elitist leadership of society by wishing away whites in order to
> easily attain a "nation".
>
> Equally, this tendency stems from the narrow definition of nation as being
> defined through language, race and culture whilst undermining progressive
> elements and the realistic challenges of the national formation in our
> society. Because of its backward nature, like its twin of white racism, it
> may pretend and sugarcoat some of its more conservative demands with
> legitimate demands for nation building.
>
> But this tendency is even more dangerous for us as the youth as we face the
> challenge of nation building for a future South Africa. Our role as youth
> formations is to lead all young people, irrespective of their culture,
> without patronising them into constituting quotas or seeking to attain
> parity. The Progressive Youth Alliance has, for instance, the task of
> winning the coloured and white population in the Western Cape over to the
> objectives of the NDR instead of seeking to outgrow them by importing young
> black South Africans from the Eastern Cape.
>
> It is a challenge also for us to win over, and not to hate, young white
> South Africans in our universities to appreciate our objectives of a
> national democratic society as a way of "liberating [them] from white
> supremacist ideology". We also have the task of winning over the Indian
> youth in KwaZulu Natal on the same objective. We need to accept them into
> our fold without question their credentials or scaring them off with
> limited, narrow and elitist "black paranoia".
>
> The progressive and epochal Morogoro (1969) document states that:
>
> "Until then [the attainment of liberation], the national sense of grievance
> is the most potent revolutionary force which must be harnessed."
>
> And what will easily constitute the national sense of grievance remains the
> class question. This, of course, is the debate for another time.
>
> Buti Manamela is an ANC Member of Parliament and the National Secretary of
> the Young Communist League of South Africa
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to