[YCLSA Discussion] Re: Revolutionary alliance of class collaboration?

Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:35:46 -0700

What do you think, Cde Sbu?

Is this Sowetan coverage unfair?

I wonder, did Ido Lekota read all of the approximately 100 e-mails that were posted here about the "car wars"? If so, maybe he did work as hard as he usually does for his articles. I wouldn't begrudge the man his crust of bread. Good luck to him. Our forum is open. We are newsworthy, are we not? I don't see why he should not be welcome.

"The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims." (Communist Manifesto, 1848)

I do admit that Ido Lekota cheats a bit, but only in petty ways, like putting a word in quotes that Dr Blade didn't say, in a way that makes you think it is authentic. I don't like that very much, I must say. I never liked that practice.
 
But as for my words, and Lenin's, I think he has quoted them well enough and I am happy to let them stand against his, with the reader as the judge. I bet people will remember those golden toilets long after they have forgotten the phony "car wars", Ido Lekota, and the Sowetan.

Let a hundred flowers bloom! Let a thousand ideas contend!

Asikhulume!

VC








sibusiso Mchunu wrote:
so Sowetan's Columnist do read YCLSA forum, i wish they can come to our meetings too. they read our emails and then write their opinions about them, in Print /electronic media and get paid... but let's engage with an article than the person.
 
17 September 2009
POLITICAL NOTEBOOK - Ido Lekota






AS I began writing this article, one word was lodged at the back of my mind – obfuscation.

Whatis.com defines obfuscation as a practice used to intentionally make something more difficult to understand.

According to the definition, a tool called an obfuscator is sometimes used to convert a straight-forward programme into one that works the same way but is much harder to understand.

The tool is used to obfuscate a security code to protect it from being attacked.

I looked up this definition after reading a contribution to the debate about ministers buying luxury cars.

This particular writer – who described himself as a communist – was taking issue with those criticising SA Communist Party general secretary and Higher Education Minister Blade Nzimande for joining the bling brigade and buying a MBW7501 costing more than R1 million.

By the way, Nzimande has since apologised for his “indiscretion”, explaining that he had not realised that the matter would be trivialised in the manner it has been.

Without accusing the GS of any obfuscation, what is trivial, really, about asking whether it is morally right to expect taxpaying South Africans to tighten their belts and then use taxes paid from their hard-earned slave wages to splurge on a luxury car?

What must be even more confusing for taxpayers is the response to the questioning by his party and some of its members, including “comrade communist”, whose contribution triggered the word “obsfuscation” in my mind.

This erudite scholar of Karl Marx argues that those who criticise the GS for buying the car are liberals and disciples of capitalism.

He wrote: “I believe that Lenin once remarked that after the revolution, toilets might be made of gold, because gold is the most hygienic material.

“The point that Lenin was trying to make is that the commodity values of things under capitalism are not the same as their use values; and that free people will in future judge things by their use values and not by their money-value, or, in other words, their capitalist market value.

“Another communist who dealt with this matter, in a rather large book called Capital, Volume 1, was Karl Marx.

“Comrades, I do speak like a communist in this respect. I am looking at the use-value, and not at the exchange value.”

“Comrade communist” went further to accuse Cosatu spokesperson Patrick Craven – who released the statement calling for the ministers to return the bling cars – of “mistaking a liberal argument for a communist one and making a virtue out of poverty”.

After reading this input I concluded that this member of the SACP was engaging in obfuscation of the highest order.

He is using both Lenin and Marx as obfuscators – turning a simple situation into a complicated lecture on Marxism.

But the unfortunate possibility could be that he genuinely believes in what he has written.

This indicates the level to which the political discourse in this country has sunk as we grapple with challenges of how to deal with access to power and self-aggrandisement versus making South Africa a better place to live in for all South Africans.

The ANC general secretary has alluded to the growing tendency of people to join politics because they regard political office as a stepping stone to self- enrichment.

He went on to say that if this tendency is nipped in the bud, there will always be ANC infighting, come election time.

This situation is compounded by the culture of crass materialism and conspicuous consumption that our politicians unfortunately seem to have fallen victim to.

As political analyst Kwandile Kondlo points out, we now have an unfortunate situation wherein ordinary South Africans cannot, for example, rely on the fact that leftists are voted into power and will cater for their needs.

These are some the challenges that both the SACP and the ANC face as they grapple with the raging leadership battles among their members who see the change of guard in the ruling party as opportunity to serve their self- interests.



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to