Cde Zulu, I can not agree more with you that "we must be able to debate and 
listen to one another. Rules of engagement must learned by all 
comrades.Arrogance really does not assist anyone." Especially because there is 
a tendency particularly to self-anointed 'senior' (usually because of urgent 
and easy exposure to reading material) comrades to (sub)consciously confuse 
comradely correction of some cadre's theoretical and practical blunders with 
misguided arrogance.
 
Although in a slightly different context, Paulo Freire (1993: 75-76) would have 
said "unfortunately...in their (the Sisulus of this world) desire to obtain the 
support of the (her views)...revolutionary leaders often fall for the banking 
line of planning program content from the top down. They forget (because of the 
comfort life their now live in by virtue of being ministers)that their 
fundamental objective is to fight along side the people..." for better working 
conditions and better payments etc.
 
I pause.
 
T.S. Zondi

>>> mandla mndebele <[email protected]> 10/2/2009 12:18 PM >>>
Cdes
My personal view is that, the attitude and arrogance presented by Cde Minister 
is informed by fear of being striped off the power. Usually being in ipower is 
both comfortable and discomfort. It is comfortable when all the receiptians are 
compliant to the power imposed to them, but power becomes uncomfortable when 
the receiptains shows a high level of wanting to exercise their rights to 
express themselves about their conditions. Cde Minister enjoys power in such a 
way that she would not like to see the establishment of a defense force union, 
bcoz she thinks that this will disempower people like her the authority to 
continue wanting to convert and convince people to accept poor working 
conditions.
The minister must move out of her comfort zone and understand that 
transformation of all the sectors including the defense force is our 
democratical mandate. I do not see the right that the defense force seeks to 
exercise leading to them undermining their commanding chief, but a way to 
follow instructions and orders from their commanding chief with an open mind 
that recognise the fact that they are human beings at the end of the day. 
Commissions have established in the past with specific objective, but date only 
a few of the have managed to reach or their mandated expectations and 
deliverable, Trade unions on the other hand has a very clear and unique 
mandate, therefore our respected minister must wake up from her known and 
unknown fears and avoid misusing her constitutional powers to supress other 
humans' rights.
Amandla !
From: Mandla HK
In Palestine/Israel
,
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Simo Zulu <[email protected]> wrote:


Cdes
Indeed ''The announcement of the establishment of the South African National
Defence Force Commission (SANDFC) has elicited a number of responses'' as the 
Minister writes.But I cannot agree with her view when she says these responses 
are 'unfortunately most of them are ill-informed'. On what basis does she come 
to this conclusion.Unions represent workers on the number of issues and that 
ought to respected as the Constitution of our country allows/stipulates, I 
believe our Minister is aware of these things. Or we must as comrades educate 
one another ( including our Minister) on the role of trade unions & that being 
a member of a union is not a priviledge but a right.Trade unions amongst other 
things, represent workers on fighting for a living wage, better working 
conditions etc. These issues can be raises and resolved by trade unions in the 
bargaining council with the employer not in a commission that exludes labour 
reprsentatives.
A Commission is set because of the fear on the part of the Minister or the ANC 
of the politicization of the defence force and that the defence force might not 
listen to the commands of the Commander in Chief. This argument really does not 
convince me, that on these basis then trade unions need to be barred from the 
defence force. As one has already reffered to to some of roles of the trade 
union, do we have to expect that this union will also champion the interests of 
workers. Im really worried about the composition of the commission.Will this 
commission really be able to address labour related issues that concern workers 
like salary increment amongst others or this commission will just instil 
discipline and enforce their decision on soldiers. Or will they pray that the 
challanges faced by workers will go away without worker representation on that 
commission.
She cames with this attitude, I know better and no one cannot tell me anything 
hence she will take it upon her self to amongst other things ''educate" COSATU 
whatever this means on issues relating to the SANDFC vs having trade unions in 
the defence force. We must be able to debate and listen to one another. Rules 
of engagement must learned by all comrades.Arrogance really does not assist 
anyone.It clearly does not solve the critical issues raised by the trade unions 
in the defence force which must correctly so be addressed as a matter of 
urgency. Our country cannot be defended by underpaid workers, however patriotic 
they might be.
Amandla!!!!





From: Siyabonga Zama <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected]; [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, October 2, 2009 8:44:42 AM
Subject: FW: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Discipline a major priority



Cde Lindiwe is now living in another planet, her attitude was really
uncalled for and it undermined the legitimacy of the grievances of the
members of the defence force. The minister failed dismally to trigger a
debate on the representation of the members of the defence force within the
force instead she became very arrogant as a result she was humiliated by the
court 



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of KGALE GODFREY MAILA
Sent: 02 October 2009 08:12 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected] 
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Re: Discipline a major priority



This woman [Lindiwe Sisulu] has proclaimed herself some sort of a
"super minister". Her views clearly undermines a spirit of open
engagement: a platform that has been established by a consequence of
Polokwane. She has become very arrogant. I think Malema must take her
hands on.

Soldiers are workers, period!

Funky

Mpumalanga

>>> [email protected] 10/01/09 6:57 PM >>>

<!--[if !vml ]--><!--[endif]--> 


Discipline a major priority 



Lindiwe Sisulu, The Star, 1 October 2009 

THE ANNOUNCEMENT of the establishment of the South African National
Defence Force Commission (SANDFC) has elicited a number of responses.
Unfortunately most of them are ill-informed. 

To start with, the conceptualisation of the commission precedes the
illegal strike by the soldiers. Secondly, a suggestion that government
and the ANC intend to subvert the constitution or the determination of
the Constitutional Court with regard to representation of the soldiers
is misleading and uninformed. 

It is true however that the events of the march have led us to rethink
the issue of the unions in the military. The president as
commander-in-chief has boldly expressed a view shared by many South
Africans on this matter. By their very nature unions are political.
Their presence in the military creates two problems. First they would
undermine the command and control structure in the defence force.
Secondly, they would create another centre of authority which could work
against that of the Chief of the Defence Force and the
Commander-in-Chief. No self-respecting country can allow this. 

I have made a number of public commitments. Prominently was to
establish a good and strong working relationship and dynamic partnership
with the Portfolio Committee on Defence. The second was to look at the
condition of service of members of the defence force. I explicitly
stated that "we are seized with the matter and I would like to engage
each one of them through the proper management structures to see how we
can attend to these. We are acutely aware that the state of readiness of
the SANDF depends primarily on the morale of our soldiers." 

I am stating these commitments to underscore the fact that the illegal
strike by members of the South African National Defence Union (Sandu)
was unnecessary, irresponsible and mischievous. Firm steps have been
taken to deal with behaviour to ensure that discipline in the Defence
Force remains a defining feature. 

To address the unhappy relationship between the public service and the
environment of the defence force of command and control, I indicated in
my budget vote that I was considering making a separate dispensation for
the Defence Force. The need for such a dispensation was succinctly
articulated by the president in his observation that "there are few
components of the state which have such a high calling; which demands
selflessness, bravery in the face of danger, the highest levels of
discipline and absolute loyalty to the constitution... The discipline of
the SANDF must at all times be kept at the highest professional
standards to ensure the public's confidence in the SANDF's ability to
protect and defend the people and the interest of the Republic of South
Africa." 

Definite steps have been undertaken towards those commitments. The
establishment of this SANDF Service Commission is the latest in a series
of steps aimed at this objective. The SANDF Service Commission has
precedence. During my tenure as Minister of Intelligence, we crafted a
separate dispensation for the Intelligence Services in appreciation and
acknowledgement of the distinctive role they play in society. The
defence force is not any different. Indeed, it was recognition of this
distinction that legislators determined that the Labour Relations Act
should not be applicable to the army, the Intelligence and Secret
Services. So, the suggestion that the ministry wants to subvert the
constitution and the law is baseless. 

The National Defence Force Service Commission will assist us to address
expeditiously matters affecting the SANDF so that our national security
is never compromised. In appointing this commission, I have been mindful
of the provisions of the Constitution and section 2 of the Defence Act,
2002. 

While the creation of the National Defence Force Service Commission
does not fall within the provisions of sub-section 2(a) of the act, as
it does not relate to the formulation and execution of defence policy
which is subject to the authority of Parliament and the national
executive, I have decided to consult the Portfolio Committee on Defence
and to seek its guidance and assistance on the creation of this
Commission, in view of the national importance of this issue. 

The Portfolio Committee was briefed on Tuesday, September 15 2009 about
my plans and undertook to discuss various aspects of this matter,
including the composition of, and the appointment of, the members of the
commission. 

Given the enormity of this task, we sought the guidance and assistance
of an impartial commission as well as Parliament to help us formulate
appropriate regulations, which will regulate these matters, until such
time as the Defence Act is properly amended to make provision for a
permanent National Defence Force Service Commission, which will be
responsible for considering the issues which affect members of the
Defence Force. 

The commission will interact with the Council of Defence and brief it
on its work from time to time. It must also interact with the soldiers
through the due protocols. 

This will enable the commission to make appropriate recommendations to
the executive. 

The commission was not set up to take the place of unions. It is
established to oversee a separate dispensation for the defence force - a
matter that the Defence Force has advocated for the last 10 years. 

As for Zwelinzima Vavi and Cosatu, it is clear that they need some
educating. And I will offer my services in this regard. 

Lindiwe Sisulu is the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans. 
<!--[if !supportLists]--><!--[endif]-->







This message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be privileged 
or otherwise protected from disclosure. They are sent for the attention of the 
named addressee(s) only. If you are not the named addressee(s) please notify 
the sender immediately and destroy this message. In this case, you should not 
copy or distribute this message or attachments, use it for any purpose or 
disclose its contents to any other person.

Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate 
to the official business of Hibiscus Coast Municipality shall be understood as 
neither given nor endorsed by it. Emails cannot be guaranteed to be secure or 
free of errors or viruses. The sender does not accept any liability or 
responsibility for any interception, corruption, destruction, loss, late 
arrival or incompleteness of or tampering or interference with any of the 
information contained in this email or for its incorrect delivery or 
non-delivery for whatsoever reason or for its effect on any electronic device 
of the recipient.

#####################################################################################
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared 
by MailMarshal
#####################################################################################

<BR



Please find our Email Disclaimer here: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to