Cde

I hear what you are saying, however I still disagree. In the interest of not 
clogging other's inboxes with our dialogue, I guess we should take it off-line 
and engage further together. For a change congratulations, on this response you 
addressed the issue to a larger extent, however you still need to learn a bit 
more to refrain from engaging in attacking people due to your own myopic way of 
viewing life and affairs, that you would like to impose on everybody else.

Regards,
Tumelo G.


From: Sithembewena tsembeyi 
To: YCL SA Discussion Blog 
Sent: Fri Mar 26 17:52:06 SAST 2010
Subject: Fw: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Jub Jub prosecutor relieved of duties

----- Forwarded Message ----From: Sithembewena tsembeyi 
<[email protected]>To: Tumi Gopane 
<[email protected]>Sent: Fri, March 26, 2010 5:51:35 PMSubject: 
Re: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Jub Jub prosecutor relieved of duties
I am sorry that you have failed to know the criminal procedural acts, and 
however for you to come to conclusions that are un-informed are a sign of the 
latest workerist tendencies facing your likes, I believe you know of the Saying 
entrenched within the constitution of the country that goes... "innocent until 
proven guilty.."However let us assist you chief, what is meant by that is that 
it is understood by the law of this country that anyone including Jub-jub is 
reffered as a suspect/acused, meaning the state has to firstly prove that he 
has indeed done the act or not, it is by this not given as many and you may 
assume that course that was his car and he was on the scene it is he who was 
either driving or who coursed the said accident, by this he is still Scot free 
but on the watch of
 suspicion that the state should convince the court, which by the way is 
independent.Then it is also by these said in the same constitution that guides 
our principles as a country that he is entitled to bail, however there some 
other aspects that the state should prove for the court not to grant bail, 
probably you are also not familiar with... so let me assist you again...For the 
State to prove the none-granting of bail to any accused/suspect it should prove 
that he is/might be a threat to the proceedings of the investigation, trough 
possible intimidation, contact or any engagement with witness and or the 
victim, secondly the state should also prove that the accused/suspect is a 
flight risk and this is very hard to prove, as we know that we have a judicial 
interlining with other international countries and lastly the state has to 
prove that either the suspect/accused life might be endangered well that you 
know that is
 impossible.So what ever is said in the article is unscientific and has not 
been officiated by the NPA and well it is for many possible reasons that the 
NPA may remove the presiding prosecutor, and however the distortions that go 
around trying to convince people that the SA prosecution authority is 
incompetent is orchestrated to mislead some like you, who fail to put analysis 
in any other issue and vividly come with rhetoric conclusions, probably you 
dont know there are many different circumstances that you should firstly 
consider for the initial case.Firstly for the base application/hearing is a 
complete different procedure than the initial court proceedings of the initial 
crime, one the Judge/magistrate who had presided in the bail hearing may or 
will not be the same in the actual case, so now the NPA is currently preparing 
the case not a bail hearing and there has no revocation of bail that the NPA 
applied for so it is also within the
 NPA now to chose who will be leading the case, and a person with appropriate 
expects shall in my knowledge be appointed by the NPA to prosecute the case.So 
Chief First get your facts straight rather than to insult my country.Hasta 
seimpre la comandanteSithembewena TsembeyiSocialismo o MuerteFrom: Tumi Gopane 
&lt;[email protected]&gt;<span
 style="font-weight: bold;">To: Sithembewena tsembeyi 
&lt;[email protected]&gt;; [email protected]: Fri, March 
26, 2010 5:17:06 PMSubject: RE: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Jub Jub prosecutor 
relieved of duties
My point is very simple. I do not think that it is appropriate to give a man 
bail who ?accidentally? killed four kids whilst engaging in illegal activities 
in the first place. These deaths were not as a result of a sober hard working 
man driving home from work to see his family. Bail is not only a function of 
flight risk as far as I understand the law.

The man that then rightfully decides to oppose bail; who is certainly a farther 
and probably a grandfather is then coincidentally shuffled around and moved 
from the case. To me those are signs of slumping into a Banana Republic as a 
country; where seemingly who you know and position in society seemingly 
determine how the law is applied on you.

Instead of disagreeing with me logically or factually where you have facts, you 
engage in personal attacks. This is very characteristic of people who cannot 
use logic and facts to debate issues, but rather divert the discussion into 
unnecessary personal and emotional attacks. I am sorry but I do not have the 
time nor the energy to invest in personal attacking discussions.

Regards,
Tumelo G.


From: Sithembewena tsembeyi 
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri Mar 26 16:46:25 SAST 2010
Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Jub Jub prosecutor relieved of duties

Ideological Vendor based on rhetoric, compradorial Ideological hermaphrodite 
logic again here you go.Learn to discuss with content failure to that we would 
request VC to use the Force removal from this blog.Hasta Siempre la comandante 
Sithembewena TsembeyiSocialismo o MuerteFrom: Tumi Gopane 
&lt;[email protected]&gt;To: Dominic Tweedie
 &lt;[email protected]&gt;; [email protected]: Fri, 
March 26, 2010 4:37:25 PMSubject: RE: [YCLSA Discussion] Jub Jub prosecutor 
relieved of duties
Banana Republic based on the Lamprecht issue, here we come.



From: Dominic Tweedie 
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri Mar 26 15:41:30 SAST 2010
Subject: [YCLSA Discussion] Jub Jub prosecutor relieved of duties






 &nbsp; 


 &nbsp; 

Jub Jub prosecutor relieved
of duties 

 &nbsp; 

 &nbsp; 


Sonja Carstens en Dani?lla du Plooy,
Beeld, Johannesburg, 25
March 2010 

 &nbsp; 

&nbsp;Johannesburg - A
chief State prosecutor has been relieved of his duties after he refused
to
execute the orders of Menzi Simelane, head of the National Prosecuting
Authority (NPA). 

 &nbsp; 

The orders were that he should not contest bail for the
musician Jub Jub. 

 &nbsp; 

Andr? (Lampies) Lambrecht, 60, chief State prosecutor of the
West Rand, was given the order three times. 

 &nbsp; 

Gladstone Maema, acting director of public prosecution (DPP)
in Gauteng, phoned Lambrecht twice to say Simelane had given the order.
Maema
repeated the order to Lambrecht for the third time in person. 

 &nbsp; 

Lambrecht refused to execute the order unless he received it
in writing, which he did not receive. 

 &nbsp; 

Lambrecht didn't respond to Simelane's verbal order, and the
State did oppose Jub Jub's bail application. 

 &nbsp; 

Visit from Malema 

 &nbsp; 

On Friday Magistrate Andr? Auret granted bail of R10 000 to
Jub Jub (Molemo Maarohanye). 

 &nbsp; 

The hip hop star is facing murder charges since he was
involved in a car race which ended in a crash which killed four
schoolboys in
Soweto. 

 &nbsp; 

One day before Jub Jub's bail application was set to begin,
he received a visit in detention from Julius Malema, president of the
ANC Youth
League. 

 &nbsp; 

Maema gave Lambrecht a letter on Tuesday in which he was
relieved of his managerial duties and told to work as a prosecutor in
court. No
reasons were given. 

 &nbsp; 

Lambrecht has been chief State prosecutor of the West Rand
for the past ten years. The prosecutors of Krugersdorp, Soweto,
Randfontein and
Roodepoort, among others, fall under him. 

 &nbsp; 

Magistrate Gert Jonker, chief magistrate of Johannesburg,
said in response to a question that the court management was informed
on
Thursday morning that Lambrecht has been relieved of his managerial
duties.
"I'm shocked. He was an extremely capable chief prosecutor." 

 &nbsp; 

'Unreasonable
treatment' 

 &nbsp; 

Manie de Clercq, deputy head manager of the Public Servants
Association (PSA), said the case has been reported to the civil service
union. 

 &nbsp; 

The union will be taking steps in accordance with the Labour
Act to support Lambrecht with the "unreasonable treatment" he
received from his employer. 

 &nbsp; 

Lambrecht was demoted without any disciplinary steps taken
against him. 

 &nbsp; 

Jan Henning, former deputy chief of the NPA, described
Lambrecht as "one of the pillars which keeps the prosecuting authority
in
the lower courts standing". 

 &nbsp; 

"If that (what happened) is the case, it's a harsh
insult to someone who doesn't deserve it at all and to someone who has
made a
much bigger contribution to the practice of law that those who decided
to
relieve him of his duties." 

 &nbsp; 

'Not about Jub Jub
case' 

 &nbsp; 

When Maema was approached for comment, he said Lambrecht's
"move" had nothing to do with the Jub Jub case. 

 &nbsp; 

"It's part of our strategy to move these people with
the expertise to the lower courts because we need them there, and big
cases are
increasingly being heard in lower courts. 

 &nbsp; 

"This is something we've been planning for quite some
time. Three other people (in similar positions) were also moved to
lower courts
on the same day." 

 &nbsp; 

According to Maema, the decision regarding the moves was
made before bail was granted in the Jub Jub case. 

 &nbsp; 

He did admit that he had spoken to Lambrecht about the Jub
Jub case and the granting of bail, but said the two issues are not
related at
all. 

 &nbsp; 

"As DPP I have to discuss issues such as this (granting
of bail and the charges against Jub Jub). We did so, and I communicated
the
decision to Simelane." 

 &nbsp; 

Lambrecht declined to comment. 

 &nbsp; 

- Beeld

 &nbsp; 


From: 
http://www.news24.com/Content/SouthAfrica/News/1059/35a8c22afa214e949f6b6725bc2c6d74/25-03-2010-11-17/Jub_Jub_prosecutor_relieved_of_duties
 


 &nbsp;



-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
&nbsp;
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
yclsa-eom-forum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the 
words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.


-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
&nbsp;
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
yclsa-eom-forum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the 
words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.



      

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
&nbsp;
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
yclsa-eom-forum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the 
words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.





      

      



-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don&#39;t have to put anything in the &quot;Subject:&quot; field. You don&#39;t 
have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an 
e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] .
&nbsp;
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
yclsa-eom-forum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the 
words &quot;REMOVE ME&quot; as the subject.

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
yclsa-eom-forum+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the 
words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.

Reply via email to