CU, No Woman, No Revolution, Part 4

Women’s Charter



We meet in the UJ Doornfontein Library. The next session will be as
follows: Date: 29 April (Thursday) Time: 17h00 sharp to 18h30 sharp
Venue: The Library, University of Johannesburg, 37 Nind Street,
Doornfontein, Johannesburg (former Technikon Witwatersrand). Cars enter
from the slip road to the left of the bridge on Siemert Road. Topic:
1954 Women's Charter



On 17 April 1954, fourteen months before the Freedom Charter was
adopted in Kliptown on 16 June 1955, the Federation of South African
Women adopted the Women’s Charter (linked below).
Following on from what we have read in the last three weeks (from
Kollontai, Lenin, and the Comintern), we can see the same thread
re-emerging several decades later here in South Africa, as for example
in this short passage from the Women’s Charter:
“We women do not form a society separate from the men. There is only
one society, and it is made up of both women and men. As women we share
the problems and anxieties of our men, and join hands with them to
remove social evils and obstacles to progress.”
The Women’s Charter was not directed against men; nor did it hold out
women as a separate class of people as compared to the men. It opposed
such a separation.
Thus it placed the question of women in the mainstream. Then it went on
to say:
“It is our intention to carry out a nation-wide programme of education
that will bring home to the men and women of all national groups the
realisation that freedom cannot be won for any one section or for the
people as a whole as long as we women are kept in bondage.”
It is very sad to read the following, from the women of 55 years ago,
knowing that it is still as true today as it was then:
“We know what it is to keep family life going in pondokkies and
shanties, or in overcrowded one-room apartments. We know the bitterness
of children taken to lawless ways, of daughters becoming unmarried
mothers whilst still at school, of boys and girls growing up without
education, training or jobs at a living wage.”
On the question of forms of organisation of women, a matter to which
the CU will return tomorrow, the Women’s Charter as such has little to
say, except for the following items from the list of demands:

- For the removal of all laws that restrict free movement, that prevent
or hinder the right of free association and activity in democratic
organisations, and the right to participate in the work of these
organisations.
- To build and strengthen women's sections in the National Liberatory
movements, the organisation of women in trade unions, and through the
peoples' varied organisation.
- To cooperate with all other organisations that have similar aims in
South Africa as well as throughout the world.

The 1954 Women’s Charter was therefore non-committal on the form of
women’s organisation. This was perhaps a sign that the matter was
already controversial. The ANC Women’s League had been founded in 1948;
we will see in later sessions that the ANC WL had its way in the 1950s
and again in the 1990s and in the 2000s, obstructing the growth of a
general women’s democratic mass movement.
The Women’s Charter of 1954 stands alone as a monument to South African
women’s determination to organise independently as women, but this is
an aspiration that has yet to be realised.
[The image above is of a 1987 FEDSAW Western Cape poster]
Click here to download the text of Women’s Charter, FEDSAW Founding
Conference, 1954 (1534 words, 3 pages)


--
Posted By DomzaNet to Communist University on 4/22/2010 09:50:00 PM

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to