Capital Volume 2, Part 2

Turnover of Capital
In the fourth paragraph of Chapter 7, which is the first chapter of
Part 2 of Capital Volume 2 (“The Turnover of Capital”), Karl Marx
quotes Chapter 23 of “Capital”, Volume 1 as follows: ‘We have seen
previously: “If production be capitalistic in form, so, too, will be
reproduction. Just as in the former the labour-process figures but as a
means towards the self-expansion of capital, so in the latter it
figures but as a means of reproducing as capital — i.e., as
self-expanding value — the value advanced.”
Capital Volume 2 is an elaboration, and not a contradiction or a
supersession of Capital Volume 1. Far from the latter being the case,
the concepts of “accumulation” and of “reproduction” are rather
strongly confirmed and reinforced in the same sense as they were
introduced in Volume 1.
Part 2 proceeds to cover variations from the simple, typical cases, so
as to prove the validity of the general theory advanced in Volume 1.
For the purpose of stimulating discussion on Part 2, we offer for
reading its final chapter, Chapter 17 (linked below to a downloadable
file).
Note that Marx continues to reference back to “Buch I” (Capital, Volume
1).
Here is a typical paragraph from the early part of this chapter:
“The simplest form in which the additional latent money-capital may be
represented is that of a hoard. It may be that this hoard is additional
gold or silver secured directly or indirectly in exchange with
countries producing precious metals. And only in this manner does the
hoarded money in a country grow absolutely. On the other hand it may be
— and is so in the majority of cases — that this hoard is nothing but
money which has been withdrawn from circulation at home and has assumed
the form of a hoard in the hands of individual capitalists. It is
furthermore possibly that this latent money-capital consists only of
tokens of value — we still ignore credit-money at this point — or of
mere claims of capitalists (titles) against third persons conferred by
legal documents. In all such cases, whatever may be the form of
existence of this additional money-capital, it represents, so far as it
is capital in spe, nothing but additional and reserved legal titles of
capitalists to future annual additional social production.”
This is followed by a very lengthy quotation from William Thompson in
an 1850 book, and then this summary of Marx’s:
“For reproduction only two normal cases are possible, apart from
disturbances, which interfere with reproduction even on a fixed scale.
“There is either reproduction on a simple scale.
“Or there is capitalisation of surplus-value, accumulation.”
This is what Capital Volume 2 is about: Reproduction, Accumulation, and
the relation between these two.
Later on, Marx writes directly:
“None of the laws established with reference to the quantity of the
circulating money in the circulation of commodities (Buch I, Kap. III),
[English edition: Ch. III. — Ed.] are changed in any way by the
capitalist character of the process of production.”
Yet then he develops a question in various ways, expressed most simply
as follows:
“The capitalist class remains consequently the sole point of departure
of the circulation of money. If they need £400 for the payment of means
of production and £100 for the payment of labour-power, they throw £500
into circulation. But the surplus-value incorporated in the product,
with a rate of surplus-value incorporated in the product, with a rate
of surplus-value of 100%, is equal in value to £100. How can they
continually draw £600 out of circulation, when they continually throw
only £500 into it? Nothing comes from nothing. The capitalist class as
a whole cannot draw out of circulation what was not previously thrown
into it.”
Marx continues to problematise this question until the end of the
chapter, and leaves some of his questions unanswered.
For example, on the question of the substitution of credit for gold in
the process of circulation, Marx writes:
“…so far as the expediencies developing with the credit system have
this effect, they increase capitalist wealth directly, either by
performing a large portion of the social production and labour-power
without any intervention of real money, or by raising the functional
capacity of the quantity of money really functioning.
“This disposes also of the absurd question whether capitalist
production in its present volume would be possible without the credit
system (even if regarded only from this point of view), that is, with
the circulation of metallic coin alone. Evidently this is not the case.
It would rather have encountered barriers in the volume of production
of precious metals. On the other hand one must not entertain any
fantastic illusions on the productive power of the credit system, so
far as it supplies or sets in motion money-capital. A further analysis
of this question is out of place here.”
We must look for those answers in Capital Volume 3, which we will come
to immediately after dealing with the third and final Part of Capital
Volume 2.
Please download and read this text: Chapter 17, The Circulation of
Surplus Value, from Capital, Volume 2, Karl Marx (13208 words)


--
Posted By DomzaNet to CUAfrica at 11/02/2010 02:07:00 PM

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to