On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Azania Matiwane
<[email protected]>wrote:

> University of Free State (UFS) is renowned because of the infamous racism
> video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4jq_sucA34> of white students,
> known as the Rietz 4 that forced the black workers to eat dog food that they
> urinated and farted on. This was a classic act of racism within the premises
> of higher education institution and this acts continues to characterise the
> UFS as an institution where racism is entrenched and embedded within the
> culture of the institution. I must say upfront that I have been one of those
> that supported Professor Jonathan Jansen on his quest to dealing with the
> issue of racism within the institution head on, knowing well how this was to
> be a challenge for him as a first black Rector and Vice-Chancellor of the
> institution. It should be said that Prof Jansen navigated the tide with care
> and skill due to the sensitivity of the matter of racism in South Africa,
> against the backdrop of atrocities suffered by the majority in the apartheid
> past of the country.
>
>
>
> However, throughout all reporting of this incident of these students, one
> cannot ignore the seemingly sexiness that’s being portrayed in various
> reports in various media houses. This leading to some sexy names like,
> “Rietz 4” which is taken from the name of the student residence where the
> incident happened, and the number of the racist students on the video. The
> thing is about racism, it hurts the recipient deeper than the naked eye can
> see. It undermines the self worthiness of an individual who is subject to
> such a racist practice, it causes an untold emotional harm that no one can
> realise except the recipient and casts self doubt. Recently, the UFS has
> launched an International Institute of Studies in Race, Reconciliation and
> Social Justice<http://mg.co.za/article/2011-02-04-take-the-baton-from-tutu>as 
> its effort to address its long history of racial discrimination, this
> event being presided upon by the respectable Nobel Laureate Archbishop
> Desmond Tutu.
>
>
>
> All these efforts are yet again being undermined by four things, one, the
> UFS banning of the student political organisations within the university,
> two, the disbandment of the Student Representative Council (SRC) that was
> duly elected through internal constitutional means, the third, the statement
> by the AfriForum Youth (an Afrikaner youth formation), that they would not
> participate in SRC elections set in August 2011 if the South African Student
> Congress (SASCO) did not participate and the demand by the Rietz 4 for R1
> million to tell the 
> story<http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Reitz-4-want-R1m-to-talk-20110227>.
>
>
>
>
> There’s everything wrong with the above scenario, first, students political
> organisations are an embodiment of social, political and religious belief
> systems which students embrace and chose to associate themselves. This means
> therefore, these student bodies are the hub of student exuberance and
> contribute to honing of student intelligentsia for future society benefit.
> Prof Jansen on the opening of the Institute had said, “The university will
> become a place that exemplifies the scholarship and practice of
> reconciliation, forgiveness and social justice...... scholars and students
> from around the world will descend on the institution to study and
> understand the theory and practice of building a community across the
> divides of race but also religion, gender, disability and ability, national
> origins and .. sexual identity.” The learned Prof could not have said it
> better, however, his muzzling of the student organisation on the institution
> pissed on the face of such bold commitments. Moreover, institutions of
> higher learning are supposed to provide space to students to pursue their
> intellectual summits and encouraging social cohesion, absence of this could
> mean building the next generation of apolitical workers. This cannot be
> acceptable in the South African society which continues to have  significant
> levels of inequalities. In SA workers need to be very conscious of the
> political state and context of their struggles and therefore
> de-politicisation of students means direct assault to the working class
> present and future struggles, which Prof Jansen also forms part.
>
>
>
> The disbandment of duly constituted SRC and replacement with management
> appointed caretakers, this couldn’t have happened at the wrong time in
> Africa more specifically, with so many uprisings against self imposed
> leaderships in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Iran, etc. These examples might be on
> a macro scale, however stock needs to be taken in that, these regimes
> were/are not enjoying support from the people that they claim to represent
> and hence the uprisings. Prof Jansen should therefore be understanding this
> better, that the June 16, 1976 was as a results of a culmination of forced
> medium of instruction, Afrikaans, above all political contestations. All in
> all, the anatomy of imposition of one’s views to the other has been proved
> beyond doubt that it’s an  enigma to problem solving and is unsustainable.
> This couldn’t have happened in the worst place, the higher education
> institution, where core values of society that would continue to influence
> nations are supposed to be crafted, it should be expected that this
> generation of students would in future presume correctness of removal
> democratically elected authority through undemocratic means, this is not a
> catastrophic example to the momentum gained by democracy in the world but
> worse for Africa.
>
>
>
> The resounding endorsement of banning of student political organisations by
> the AfriForum Youth is rather suspicious that, perhaps all these activities
> are part of a coordinated effort to depoliticise the students of UFS and
> furthermore marginalise the voice of those that continue to be subject to
> acts of racism within the institution.
>
>
>
> Lastly, the demand by the Reitz 4 for R1million in order for them to tell
> the story of how they urinated and farted on dog food and gave it to the
> black workers to eat is not only blasphemous to the reconciliation process
> and the launch of the institute, its literally urine to the faces of all
> those that believed these racist video former students have changed and are
> remorseful. It proves further the incorrectness of the crass materialism,
> that these idiots believe that even through the worst case of racism act,
> there is an opportunity to amass wealth at the expense of black workers
> dignity. The workers cannot therefore sit on the sidelines and watch while
> their own are being subject to impunity, malign and humiliation. They should
> speak out against the anatomy of muzzling debate and its enigma to solving
> problems like 
> ANC<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=223369&sn=Marketingweb+detail>,
> Cosatu<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=223366&sn=Marketingweb+detail>and
>  Trevor
> Manuel<http://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/trevor-manuel-s-open-letter-to-jimmy-manyi-1.1034606>has
>  done against the racist comments by one Jimmy
> Manyi on coloured 
> people<http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=223040&sn=Marketingweb+detail>,
> which saw him 
> apologise<http://www.timeslive.co.za/Politics/article937985.ece/Blast-from-ANC-led-to-Manyi-apology>.
> Racism needs not be tolerated in all its manifestations irrespective of
> which race grouping that subjects the other to such a heinous  atrocities,
> it needs to be rebuked in strongest terms it deserves.
>
> Mr Azania Matiwane
> Blog:
> http://blogs.fin24.com/Azaniam/anatomy-of-muzzling-debate-and-its-enigma-to-solving-problems
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to