The State should be using such amounts to protect job loses. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Trevor Kekana <[email protected]>wrote:
> Gugu,**** > > ** ** > > I think I must familiarise myself with that resolution. Did Polokwane > resolve to ban labour brokers or did Congress resolve to regulate labour > brokers?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *[email protected] > *Sent:* 20 July 2011 08:22 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Government to expand labour inspectorate > **** > > ** ** > > Highly defeatist! **** > > Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!**** > ------------------------------ > > *From: *Dominic Tweedie <[email protected]> **** > > *Sender: *[email protected] **** > > *Date: *Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:13:57 +0200**** > > *To: *<[email protected]>**** > > *ReplyTo: *[email protected] **** > > *Subject: *[YCLSA Discussion] Government to expand labour inspectorate**** > > ** ** > > > [image: Business Day] > > > *State to spend R60m vetting labour brokers * > > *Government will employ additional inspectors to monitor labour brokers > and ensure they adhere to regulations being amended * > > **** > > *Alistair Anderson, Business Day, Johannesburg, 20 July 2011* > > THE government has set aside R60m to employ additional inspectors to > monitor labour brokers and ensure they adhere to regulations being amended, > Labour Minister Nelisiwe Oliphant said yesterday. > > Employing inspectors for the next financial year, in categories such as > enforcing labour law and ensuring workers’ safety, was a priority, she said > in Pretoria. > > While the government still saw labour broking in an unfavourable light, Ms > Oliphant said talks were being held at the National Economic, Development > and Labour Council (Nedlac) between the government, unions and business to > address problems in labour broking legislation. > > Both the government and unions have voiced concern that labour brokers > often abuse workers’ rights, but the government has also conceded that > millions of people are employed by labour brokers. Unions have repeatedly > raised the banning of labour brokers as a wage and benefits demand during > strikes. > > "A central objective of the current round of amendments to labour > legislation is to deal with the increase in labour broking and, in > particular, with the abuses associated with the practice and the way in > which it deprives many workers of basic protections under labour law," Ms > Oliphant said yesterday. > > The labour bills being discussed at Nedlac are the Basic Conditions of > Employment Act, the Employment Equity Act, the Labour Relations Act and > Employment Services Bill . > > Ms Oliphant said a team at Nedlac was engaging on the amendments and "had > decided to discuss changes under a number of themes and to broaden the scope > of amendments further". > > "I am pleased to report that the work in Nedlac is progressing well and > there is a meeting of minds on a number of issues. New legal drafting has > started on the following issues including fixed-term contracts; temporary > employment agencies; part-time work; and probation." > > She said because of the urgency attached to the amendments, three meetings > were "in the pipeline at Nedlac to continue with the discussion". A meeting > is scheduled for tomorrow and two more meetings for next month. > > "As government, we have agreed with the social partners to reopen > discussion on the key issues that require legal amendments before proceeding > with legal drafting. > > "I am sure that we all want certainty about the new legal framework as soon > as possible and time is, therefore, of the essence. > > "But while speed in finalising the process is important, we would want a > final product that enjoys the support of organised business and organised > labour," she said. > > Ms Oliphant said labour statutes needed to be "simple" and "coherent". > During the public hearing the bills were criticised for their "incoherent" > and "confusing" wording. > > "In addition to enjoying the support of our social partners, our labour > legislation must meet two additional criteria. > > "First, labour statutes should be simple. Labour law guides the courts, > employers and employees as well as labour organisations … and it should be > understandable. Second, our labour laws need to be coherent. At a time when > we are amending three statutes and introducing a fourth, it is imperative > that we have coherence between statutes." > > She hoped the bills would be drafted by November. But Ian Ollis, the > Democratic Alliance’s spokesman on labour, said the process may take longer. > "Only one section of one bill has been completed," he said. > > *[email protected]* > > **** > > *From: http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=148711* > * * > * * > * ***** > > -- > You are subscribed. This footer can help you. > Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to > this message. > You can visit the group WEB SITE at > http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery > options, pages, files and membership. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected]. > You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to > put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to > this address (repeat): [email protected] .**** > > -- > You are subscribed. This footer can help you. > Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to > this message. > You can visit the group WEB SITE at > http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery > options, pages, files and membership. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected]. > You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to > put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to > this address (repeat): [email protected] .**** > > http://www.investec.com/en_group/#home/legal/email_disclaimer.html > > The disclaimer also provides our corporate information and names of our > directors as required by law. > > The disclaimer is deemed to form part of this message in terms of Section > 11 of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002. > If you cannot access the disclaimer, please obtain a copy thereof from us > by sending an email to: [email protected] > > -- > You are subscribed. This footer can help you. > Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to > this message. > You can visit the group WEB SITE at > http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery > options, pages, files and membership. > To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected]. > You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to > put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to > this address (repeat): [email protected] . > -- You are subscribed. This footer can help you. Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message. You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership. To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] .
<<image001.gif>>
