Sorry Cde Dominic, indeed the documents are attached. It seems that for a 
moment there technology conquered me.
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Dominic Tweedie <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:17:46 
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [YCLSA Discussion] Being, Essence and Notion, The three divisions
 of Hegel's "Logic"

Dear Cde Thamsanqa,

I have been attaching the documents for a few weeks past, to all political
education posts, and I did so in this case, as you have probably noticed by
now.

I don't want to abandon the downloadable links. Those are important means of
accessibility for a lot of people.

But I will probably continue to attach the documents.

I will try to answer your other message (on CU) shortly.


VC


On 6 October 2011 16:56, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Comrade Domza,
>
> May you please attach the documents instead of just providing the link? For
> some reason I can't download these. My apologies for imposing an additional
> burden on you.
>
> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Dominic Tweedie <[email protected]>
> *Sender: * [email protected]
> *Date: *Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:55:06 +0200
> *To: *<[email protected]>
> *ReplyTo: * [email protected]
> *Subject: *[YCLSA Discussion] Being, Essence and Notion, The three
> divisions of Hegel's "Logic"
>
> *CU Course on Hegel, Part 5*
>
> **
> [image: Immediate]**
>
> *“Immediacy”: Unselfconscious Being*
>
> ** **
>
> *Being, Essence and Notion*
>
> * *
>
> *The three divisions of the Logic*
>   **
> **
> Lenin wrote: *“It is impossible completely to understand Marx's Capital…
> without having thoroughly studied and understood the whole of Hegel's
> Logic.” *Our mission, given by Lenin, is therefore to thoroughly study and
> understand the whole of Hegel’s Logic.
> ** **
> We soon find that there are actually two Logics: *The Shorter 
> Logic<http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/sl_index.htm>
> *, and *The Science of 
> Logic<http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/hl_index.htm>
> *; but they are similar and are both divided by three main headings:  *
> Being*, *Essence* and *Notion*.
> ** **
> This time we are going to reverse the order and take Andy Blunden’s lecture
> as the main item, simply because Andy has done a great job.
> ** **
> There is a movement from Being, through Essence, to Notion. This is not to
> deny the importance of the argument and the detail, but to say that what
> distinguishes Hegel’s Logic is that it shows how things develop from nothing
> to something. It is not a static philosophy of positions and definitions.
> Nor is it an owners’ manual for the mind.  It is a science of creation,
> and development. The beginning is Being, which is “immediate” with as yet no
> past and no future. Hence our illustration of the unselfconscious puppy-dog,
> above.
> ** **
> The following are extracts from Andy Blunden’s lecture, finishing with a
> reference back to Marx’s Capital, that may assist readers to get a quick
> overview of Andy’s overview of Hegel’s “Logic”:
> ** **
> *“I should mention here as an aside that all Hegel’s major works have the
> same structure: he identifies the simple concept or notion which marks the
> unconditioned starting point for the given science, and then he applies the
> method, the model for which is given in the Logic, in order to elaborate
> what is implicit in the given concept; he develops ‘the peculiar internal
> development of the thing itself.’  *
> * *
> *“So, the Logic begins with a critique of Being, what is contained in the
> concept of ‘Being’. The Logic is really the study of concepts; so, the
> Concept is the truth of Being, whilst Being is the Concept still ‘in
> itself’. The Third Book of the Logic is the Doctrine of the Notion (or
> Concept which is same thing), that is, the Concept for itself. But in the
> Doctrine of Being, the Concept is still just ‘in itself’.  *
> * *
> *“If there is to be some thing amidst the infinite coming and going, the
> chaos of existence, the simplest actual thing that can be is a Quality,
> something that persists amidst change. And if we ask what it is that changes
> while it remains of the same quality, what changes when the thing still
> remains what it is, then this is what we call Quantity. But a thing cannot
> indefinitely undergo quantitative change and remain still what it is, retain
> the same quality; at some point, a quantitative change amounts to a change
> in Quality, and this Quantitative change which amounts to a Qualitative
> change, the unity of Quality and Quantity, we call the Measure of the thing.
> *
> * *
> *“Thus there are three grades of Being: Quality, Quantity and Measure. We
> apply these categories to things that we regard as objects, the business of
> the positivist sociologist, the observer. Even a participant in a not yet
> emergent social change or sociological category, has to play the role of
> sociologist to be conscious of it.  *
> * *
> *“Essence is reflection… When people reflect on things, they do so only
> with the aid of what they already know. So reflection is a good term. It is
> new Being, reflected in the mirror of old concepts. It’s like what Marx was
> talking about in the “Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte”: *
> ** **
> ‘The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the
> brains of the living. And just as they seem to be occupied with
> revolutionizing themselves and things, creating something that did not exist
> before, precisely in such epochs of revolutionary crisis they anxiously
> conjure up the spirits of the past to their service, borrowing from them
> names, battle slogans, and costumes in order to present this new scene in
> world history in time-honoured disguise and borrowed language.’ (18th
> Brumaire, I)
> ** **
> *“The third part of the Logic is the Doctrine of the Notion. Notion is a
> translation of the German word Begriff which is also translated as
> ‘concept’.  *
> * *
> *“The Doctrine of the Notion begins with an abstract notion, and the
> process of the Notion is that it gets more and more concrete.  *
> * *
> *“The first section of the Notion is Subjectivity, or the Subject. And
> here for the first time we get a glimpse of Hegel’s conception of the
> subject: it is not an individual person in any sense at all, but a simple
> element of consciousness arising from social practices which implicate the
> whole community, reflected in language, the whole social division of labour
> and so on.  *
> * *
> *“The process of the Doctrine of the Notion is the abstract notion
> becoming more and more concrete. This process of concretization takes place
> through objectification of subjectivity, that is, through the
> subject-object relation. The first thing to grasp about the Object, which is
> the second division of the Doctrine of the Notion, is that the Object may be
> other Subjects, Subjects which are Objects in relation to the Subject or
> Subjects which have become thoroughly objectified. Objectification is not
> limited to the construction of material objects or texts; it’s a bit like
> ‘mainstreaming’, or being institutionalized. The process of development of
> the Subject is a striving to transform the Object according to its own
> image, but in the process the Subject itself is changed and in the process
> of objectification becomes a part of the living whole of the community.*
> * *
> *“The unity of Subject and Object, the third and last grade of the
> Doctrine of the Notion, is the Idea. The Idea can be understood as the whole
> community as an intelligible whole, it is the summation of the pure
> essentialities of a complete historical form of life. It is the logical
> representation of Spirit, or of the development and life of an entire
> community, in the form of a concrete concept.  *
> * *
> *“So the starting point of a science is the Notion which forms the subject
> of the science, not Being. This is worth mentioning because there is a
> widespread fallacy about the relation between Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s
> Logic. Some writers have put Capital up against the Logic, and in an effort
> to match them, start by equating the commodity relation with Being, on the
> basis that the commodity relation is the “simplest relation” or on the basis
> that the commodity relation is immediate. But the first thing to be done in
> a science, according to Hegel (and Marx followed Hegel in this), is to form
> a Notion of the subject, the simplest possible relation whose unfolding
> produces the relevant science. In the case of Capital, this abstract notion,
> the germ of capital, is the commodity relation. In the case of the
> Philosophy of Right, it was the relation of Abstract Right, that is private
> property. The problem of the origins of value or of the commodity relation
> is a different question, and Marx demonstrates his familiarity with the
> Doctrine of Essence in the third section of Chapter One, where the
> money-form is shown to emerge out of a series of relations constituting
> historically articulated resolutions of the problem of realizing an expanded
> division of labour.”*
> ** **
> *Please download and read this text via the link:*
> *Hegel’s Logic - Being, Essence and Notion, 2007, 
> Blunden<https://sites.google.com/site/communistuniversity/texts/22-hegel-dialectics/2205Hegel%E2%80%99sLogic-Being%2CEssenceandNotion%2C2007%2CBlunden.doc?attredirects=0&d=1>
> * (4951 words)
> ** **
> *Further reading:*
> *Excerpts from Hegel on Being, Essence and 
> Notion<https://sites.google.com/site/communistuniversity/texts/22-hegel-dialectics/2205aExcerptsfromHegelonBeing%2CEssenceandNotion.doc?attredirects=0&d=1>
> * (1040 words)
> ** **
> ** **
> ** **
>
> --
> You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
> Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to
> this message.
> You can visit the group WEB SITE at
> http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery
> options, pages, files and membership.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected]. 
> You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to
> put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to
> this address (repeat): [email protected] .
>
> --
> You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
> Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to
> this message.
> You can visit the group WEB SITE at
> http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery
> options, pages, files and membership.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected]. 
> You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to
> put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to
> this address (repeat): [email protected] .
>



-- 
The Communist University *Blog* is at:
*http://domza.blogspot.com/*<http://domza.blogspot.com/>
*Mail Subscription*:
*http://groups.google.com/group/Communist-University/*<http://groups.google.com/group/Communist-University/>
CU Site for *downloads*: *https://sites.google.com/site/communistuniversity/
*
The *CU Africa* blog is at: *http://cuafrica.blogspot.com/* (Subscribe
*here<http://groups.google.com/group/CUAfrica>
*)
The *SADTU* PolEd blog is: *http://sadtu-pol-ed.blogspot.com/* (Subscribe *
here <http://groups.google.com/group/sadtu-political-education-forum>*)
The *old CU site* is: http://amadlandawonye.wikispaces.com/
Subscription/unsubscribing *difficulties*? Mail *[email protected]*

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

Reply via email to