Crisis not an excuse for cuts in development cooperation spending (14 November
2012)
* Posted by Norman Ntai on November 15, 2012 at 3:31 in Accreditation,
training material, assessment
Crisis not an excuse for cuts in development cooperation spending (14 November
2012)
The EI annual Development Cooperation (DC) meeting gathered 37 participants
from 13 countries on 12-13 November in Brussels, Belgium. One of the six
sessions allowed participants to take stock of the impact of the economic
crisis on DC funding and activities, and discuss solutions.
“This meeting’s agenda has been developed around the impact of the economic and
financial crisis on development cooperation,” said EI General Secretary Fred
van Leeuwen in his opening remarks. “There is a strong need to develop new
strategies to mitigate the effects of this crisis.”
New EI initiatives pushing DC work forward
Van Leeuwen underlined three crucial initiatives in DC in education:
* The organisers’ network, showing that EI tries to mobilise expertise
available in member organisations to develop strategies
* Occupy Education, helping affiliates become better equipped to engage
in social dialogue with governments
* Encouraging member organisations to be involved in the Global
Partnership for Education (GPE)
“Capacity-building is the best-funded part of EI programme budget,” van Leeuwen
acknowledged. “In Burma, for example, it is vital to step up our work to
support the emerging trade unions movement. We have to start from scratch in
this country.”
Elsewhere, in Brazil and Argentina, education unions are becoming major actors
in DC and the participation of their trade unions’ representatives at the
meeting was highlighted.
Van Leeuwen also indicated that EI will continue with its regional women’s
networks, as they are very valuable tools in its work. And he reminded
participants about the UN Secretary General’s Education First Initiative,
reiterating that it is important to progress towards the EI five priorities.
Canada: Crisis an excuse to cut DC spending
Richard Langlois from the Centrale de Syndicats du Québec (CSQ) was the first
speaker at the meeting’s first Session on The Impact of the Global Economic
Crisis on Development Cooperation.
“In Canada, the Official Development Assistance (ODA) was reduced by 5.3 per
cent in 2011, for the first time since 1997,” he said. “The objective of
spending 0.7 per cent of the Canadian GDP is becoming less likely. There is a
general decrease in ODA in almost all countries, despite governmental
commitments towards the realisation of Millennium Development Goals by 2015.”
He stated that this is not a question of economic crisis: “It is just an excuse
for the government to pursue its political agenda.”
In 2011, CSQ lost CAD200,000 for DC activities.
Langlois also deplored the fact that the Canadian International Development
Agency (CIDA) follows governmental priorities linked to government foreign and
trade policies - and trade unions must wait for the CIDA to launch a call for
proposals to submit a project proposal.
Last year, he explained, no trade union benefited from a grant from this
agency, and a number of partnerships with Southern countries had to be
terminated.
On 13 November, CSQ, along with other education unions and an NGO, the
International Labour Solidarity Centre, held a press conference to urge the
conservative government to undertake more DC work.
CSQ also supports the creation of a new Quebecois agency. It will engage in the
creation of consortia with NGOs and other Quebecois trade unions, and look for
other sources of autonomous funding for DC activities.
Nederlands: Finding other sources of funding for DC activities
Trudy Kerperien, from AOb/Netherlands, stated that in her country, the economic
crisis is just an excuse to cut more in DC funding: “But for at least 10 years,
there has already been a poor climate and a campaign by political forces
against DC relayed by the media.”
Negative press coverage has portrayed ODA as representing 20 per cent of the
national budget, which is false.
“An evaluation of DC activities has been held, but decisions have already been
taken as if the results were negative,” Kerperien said. “But they are in fact
positive, 29 per cent of surveyed people said they were satisfied.”
Because the DC budget has been more than halved, the Netherlands needs to
change its strategies, she underlined.
She said that the confederation, of which AOb is a member, still has a DC
budget, although this budget covers limited countries and areas – education is
not officially recognised. Also, AOb can use its own trade union solidarity
fund, as 0.7 per cent of the membership fees go to DC activities. It is
therefore a stable and growing fund.
“The Confederation now tries to find other sources of founding, like receiving
inheritances, or fund-raising from members,” Kerperien said. “They seek
cooperation with ‘unusual’ donors, i.e. with a lottery, or cooperation with
other NGOs.”
She added that AOb is shifting its focus in DC work: “We now focus on effective
short-term actions, triggering things for later. We try to connect southern
partners among themselves, so that it’s more effective. And we support partners
in finding their own way of financing plans.”
Canada: negative effects of cuts in DC
During the session, Alex Davidson from the Canadian Teachers’ Federation (CTF)
raised the issue of pensions, saying that pension funds are currently under a
lot of pressure.
“The CIDA turned into an organisation working for corporations,” he said.
“Trade unions and teachers’ organisations do not receive these funds.”
He also noted that the effect of this shift in CIDA objectives on education in
Canada and abroad is profound, leading to commodification and teacher
deprofessionalisation.
Davidson said that there is a considerable temptation to develop short-sighted
aims that would pervert values or established good practices.
Stressing that CTF is looking at other sources of funding, as its autonomy in
DC activities is in jeopardy, he explained that funds can come from foundations
having an acceptable agenda. He added that he agrees with the idea of looking
more at South/South cooperation and capacity-building initiatives.
“It’s important that CTF remains a force in Canada,” he said. “We must remain
strong, united and seek alliances in civil society. Public opinion changes when
there is a broad-based understanding for development work.”
Building consortia at European level
Martin Rømer, the Director of EI European region, the European Trade Union
Committee for Education (ETUCE), indicated that only a few European countries
are currently able to do DC work.
“We must look for new funds and adapt to a changing world,” Rømer said. “ETUCE
tries to help affiliates in Eastern European countries. We look into
neighbourhood policies programmes, structural funds, among others, for funding.”
He acknowledged that often, it is too complicated for organisations alone to
apply for European funds. There is therefore a need to build consortia.
“What are the possibilities of being big enough to get sustainable money?” he
asked. “We must advise affiliates to work more at national level to form
foundations or consortia. We also need to explore the EuropeAid programme in
its full extent, and make sure that education is mentioned in concrete
agreements as an area of work.”
He regretted that, sometimes, trade unions must get national agreement to
receive European funding. And this can be a problem if the Government opposes
such a move.
Rømer added that private funds from foundations must be explored. He called on
affiliates to be clearer in their aims, and reform DC structures.
The DC meeting agenda is available here
--
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options,
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this
address (repeat): [email protected] .
