The Death of Social Democracy

 

"The Death of Social Democracy in the Age of Global Monopoly-Finance Capital": 
An Interview with John Bellamy Foster



 

Tassos Tsakiroglou, Monthly Review, USA, 18 January 2014

 

Tassos Tsakiroglou: How urgent do you consider the necessity to develop an 
understanding of the interconnections between the deepening impasse of the 
capitalist economy and the rapidly accelerating ecological threat?

 

John Bellamy Foster: The urgency of understanding the interconnections between 
the  <http://monthlyreview.org/2014/01/01/the-plight-of-the-u-s-working-class> 
economic impassse and the  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/12/01/marx-rift-universal-metabolism-nature> 
ecological emergency derives from the combined threats they pose to the 
material conditions of the world's population and to humanity's long-term 
survival.  On the surface they may appear to represent discrete, even 
diametrically opposed, problems.  Their real interconnection is apparent only 
when we penetrate to the level of production and come to see them as rooted in 
the very process of capital accumulation.  Today there is no exit from the 
economic and the ecological crises that beset us that does not require exiting 
capitalism itself.

 

You make a distinction between the present  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/10/01/epochal-crisis> "epochal crisis" and 
"ordinary developmental crises."  What's exactly the difference?

 

Periodic economic crises of the kind associated with the business cycle are an 
inherent feature of the capital accumulation process.   
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/07/01/introduction-to-the-second-edition-of-the-theory-of-monopoly-capitalism>
 Monopoly capitalism is also subject to a tendency to  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2012/06/01/why-stagnation-2> stagnation or long-term 
slowdowns in the trend rate of growth.  Slow growth is now the norm in mature 
captitalism -- partly counteracted by the  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2010/10/01/the-financialization-of-accumulation> 
financialization of the economy, which of course carries its own inherent 
dangers.  Together these phenomena encompass what we can call economic or 
"developmental" crises.

 

But we can also talk about the emergence at certain transitional periods of 
human history of the phenomenon of  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/10/01/epochal-crisis> "epochal crisis" in the 
sense of a structural crisis of an entire mode of production, where the system 
comes up against its own abolute limits: internal and external.  Such an 
epochal crisis is visible in the undermining of all material conditions: 
economic and ecological.  Today the planetary environmental emergency is so 
immense that the scientific consensus tells us that the long-term survival of 
humanity is in question; while at the same time we are confronted with economic 
stagnation and financialization.  Together these conditions represent the 
crisis of an entire epoch of human history.

 

During the crisis, dominant media and communication industry play a decisive 
role in maintaining the social order, in justifying the austerity programs and 
in defaming struggles of political resistance.  Is there any alternative?

 

Aside from the pervasive ideological reality of capitalism whereby the class 
which owns the means of material production also generally owns the means of 
mental production (i.e. communications) -- as Marx and Engels put it in  
<http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01b.htm> The 
German Ideology -- there are media problems that are specific to our time.  
Both the traditional mass media and professional journalism are being rapidly 
dismantled by the Internet, which is itself becoming monopolized at the speed 
of light.  This means, as  <http://monthlyreview.org/author/robertwmcchesney> 
Robert McChesney argues in the forthcoming February issue of  
<http://monthlyreview.org/> Monthly Review, we must: (1) view the new Internet 
monopolies as forms of monopoly capital and oppose their very basis of 
existence; and (2) treat journalism as a public good that needs public 
subsidies if a democratic climate is to be ensured.  And this would be only the 
beginning of a media revolt.  As argued in the  
<http://monthlyreview.org/archives/2013/volume-65-issue-03-july-august> 
July-August 2013 issue of Monthly Review the left vitally needs to revive its 
larger critique of the  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/07/01/the-cultural-apparatus-of-monopoly-capital>
 cultural apparatus that briefly arose in the early 1960s (rooted in the 
earlier ideas of  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/07/01/st-brecht-and-the-theatrical-stock-exchange>
 Bertolt Brecht) but was later forgotten.

 

Here in Greece we have a wave of revelations about corruption concerning 
millions of euros coming from briberies from military supplies.  One of the ex 
ministers is already in jail.  What's the social cost of military spending?

 

The social cost of the  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2008/10/01/the-u-s-imperial-triangle-and-military-spending>
 capitalist military is as great as the cost of the capitalist mode of 
production itself: the inequality, exploitation, waste, destruction, pervasive 
corruption, and class surveillance of our societies -- the lost human lives and 
creativity.  The military is used to keep the 
<http://monthlyreview.org/2011/11/01/the-global-reserve-army-of-labor-and-the-new-imperialism>
 imperialist world economy intact -- to stave off change, and to ensure 
repression.  Opposition to militarism and imperialism is therefore the first 
requirement of a global resistance movement.

 

Where does the current crisis of capitalism leave social democracy 
<http://monthlyreview.org/2014/01/01/european-labor> , given the dominance of 
neoliberalism and the destruction of theWelfare State 
<http://monthlyreview.org/2014/01/01/european-labor> ?

 

Neoliberalism stands for the  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2014/01/01/european-labor> death of social democracy 
in the age of <http://monthlyreview.org/2012/05/01/the-endless-crisis> global 
monopoly-finance capital.  Social democracy was supposed to be "capitalism with 
a human face."  Very little room remains in the system for even the pretense of 
this.  The danger of the left focusing its critque on 
<http://monthlyreview.org/2006/04/01/neoliberalism-myths-and-reality> 
neoliberalism rather than capitalism iself is that this often conceals a naïve 
wish to restore social democracy rather than recognizing present realities and 
and the fact that any forward movement requires genuine socialism as its 
object.  That doesn't mean that we should stop fighting for reforms but 
nowadays they have to be connected to  
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/04/01/marx-kalecki-and-socialist-strategy> 
strategies for fundamental social transformation.  There is no middle ground or 
Third Way.

 

You have said that  <http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2013/foster180713.html> 
"[i]n the context of the present structural crisis there is strong evidence of 
an emerging revival of Marxist analysis." How do you expain this?

 

Jean-Paul Sartre once wrote that  
<http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/sartre/works/critic/sartre1.htm> "an 
anti-Marxist argument is only the apparent rejuvenation of a pre-Marxist idea." 
 What he meant was that it was impossible to trancend historical materialism in 
any forward-moving struggle, since it stood for the revolutionary human 
movement of the oppressed themselves.  The revival of Marxian analysis is an 
inevitable product of the return of history: of the collective struggle not 
just to understand the world but to change it.

  _____  

 

 <http://monthlyreview.org/author/johnbellamyfoster> John Bellamy Foster is 
editor of  <http://monthlyreview.org/> Monthly Review and professor of 
sociology at the University of Oregon.  His latest book, written with Robert W. 
McChesney, is  <http://monthlyreview.org/press/books/cl3133/> The Endless 
Crisis: How Monopoly-Finance Capital Creates Stagnation and Upheaval from the 
USA to China (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2012).   
<http://monthlyreview.org/2013/07/01/introduction-to-the-second-edition-of-the-theory-of-monopoly-capitalism>
 A new edition of his book The Theory of Monopoly Capitalism will be published 
in April 2014.  Tassos Tsakiroglou is political editor of the Athens-based 
Journal of Editors (Εφημερίδα των Συντακτών/Εfimerida ton Syntakton).  Follow 
Tsakiroglou on Twitter <https://twitter.com/ttsakir> @ttsakir.  The original 
interview in Greek may be read at < <http://www.efsyn.gr/?p=165468> 
www.efsyn.gr/?p=165468>.

 

 

From: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/2014/foster180114.html

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to