Sunday Times.gif

 

 

Honeymoon may be over for AMCU boss

 

 

Chris Barron, Sunday Times Business Times, Johannesburg, 26 January 2014

 

Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) boss Joseph
Mathunjwa was interviewed as members began their strike on the platinum
mines this week. It was a brief and slightly chilling experience.

 

A belligerent Mr Mathunjwa made it clear he was not prepared to answer
questions about the economic consequences of the strike, his leadership, how
many members actually want to strike or the self-interest involved in making
extraordinary promises he has no hope of fulfilling but which have swelled
membership numbers, and, substantially, AMCU's bank balance thanks to the
subscriptions they pay to Mr Mathunjwa.

 

All such questions were "nonsensical", he said, and he was not going to
dignify them with a response.

 

The honeymoon period he appeared to enjoy with the media when AMCU achieved
national prominence almost overnight after a six-week wildcat strike at
Implats in 2011 seems to be over.

 

Back then and even after the Marikana tragedy, which many blamed at least
partly on AMCU, Mr Mathunjwa managed to stay reasonably calm and polite
during interviews as he told the media that AMCU would be everything that
the National Union of Mineworkers was not.

 

It would have no political agenda, no cosy relationship with the mining
companies, no fat-cat salaries and luxury limousines that created a chasm
between the leadership and their members.

 

But as doubt about his leadership, internal tension and allegations of
corruption have mounted he has become increasingly belligerent. Under his
carefully constructed veneer of civility disturbing signs of intolerance
have appeared.

 

Last Sunday, he said at a mass meeting of members at Rustenburg stadium that
those criticising and making allegations against the leadership must be
identified and dealt with.

 

But back to our abortive interview.

 

"I am so disappointed with the Sunday Times," he said. Before answering any
questions he needed to "check with your editors" about a story that appeared
last week.

 

"The Sunday Times still has to sort out our position with their writer
before I talk to you."

 

What was his real motivation for this week's strike action?

 

"There is no motivation from me. Workers are motivated by the poverty they
experience every day. They don't need my motivation. They have their own
motivation."

 

They say many of them don't want to strike?

 

"That is rubbish."

 

Shop stewards have said that the views of AMCU members about going on strike
were not properly canvassed?

 

"I don't want to be rude to you because you are still pushing the very same
propaganda. You want me to glorify, or dignify, your nonsensical questions.
It is very much unprofessional of you."

 

When asked if he actually wanted to bring the industry to its knees, he
terminated the "interview" with the press of a button.

 

Close observers of Mr Mathunjwa still don't know what to make of him. He's
fairly religious, says "God bless you" if you don't annoy him, but can be
insulting if you do. He does not trust the other side an inch and his body
language makes this plain from the moment he walks into a negotiating room.

 

This makes it difficult to negotiate with him because in essence
negotiations are built on trust and give-and-take.

 

His method of negotiating is to start with an outrageous demand and refuse
to budge.

 

The jury is still out on his intelligence and ability to think
strategically. But it is his emotional intelligence that bothers those
negotiating with him, the extent to which he is driven by his hatred of the
NUM.

 

This goes back to 1998 when the then general secretary Gwede Mantashe worked
him out of the NUM. Some think he has become fixated on annihilating the
NUM, and suspect that his emotions take precedence over strategic thinking,
which is why he makes decisions that in the long term are not in the
interests even of his own members. He gives a sense that he is driving a
personal agenda.

 

Is he a capitalist? A socialist? A socialist with a capitalist heart? Nobody
really knows.

 

He has been very coy about his political allegiances, at great pains to deny
affiliation to any political party.

 

He believes that workers are abused, and that mine bosses are evil, fat-cat
capitalists determined to screw them every which way they can.

 

He presents himself, by contrast, as someone entirely uninterested in
self-enrichment, whose only concern is to protect the interests of the
workers because the NUM was not doing so.

 

Then on Sunday he arrives to address his poverty-stricken, abused members in
Rustenburg in a brand-new Lexus with three white bodyguards. And one
wonders.

 

Mr Mathunjwa does not delegate in any meaningful sense of the word, either
because he cannot or does not want to.

 

Last year, he cut his chief negotiator Jeff Mphahlele, AMCU's likeable
general secretary, off at the knees in front of negotiators, shop stewards
and gold companies when after four months of negotiations, he said he wanted
to caucus members on whether to sign a pay agreement with the Chamber of
Mines.

 

Mr Mathunjwa, who had nothing to do with the negotiations, turned to Mr
Mphahlele and said that would not be necessary. Then he went on an emotional
rampage, and AMCU never signed the agreement that the other unions signed.

 

Although his members have benefited from it, Mr Mathunjwa used this to
justify calling a strike in the gold sector this week. The chamber got a
temporary interdict preventing it.

 

This is a clear example of the lack of democracy his critics complain about.
The buck stops with Mr Mathunjwa. Any delegation is superficial. In the end,
only he makes the decisions. And it is hard to see how they've benefited the
members whose subscriptions add R10m a year to AMCU's coffers.

 

What he or AMCU does with the money is anyone's guess.

 

One-and-a-half years after Marikana, his head office is still in Witbank,
but the bulk of his members are in Rustenburg.

 

Why he hasn't moved or at least opened an office in Rustenburg to be more
accessible to his members, is another unanswered question.

 

Has he just not thought about it or doesn't he care? Is there some deep
strategic reason or is it just bad planning or no planning at all?

 

He loves addressing the masses, and is a brilliant rabble rouser. But when
he takes part in negotiations his ignorance about gold mining is
embarrassingly exposed. Which is why he seldom does. During the wage
negotiations on gold he didn't attend a single meeting. He left it to Mr
Mphahlele, who is polite and open to proposals, but only marginally more
knowledgeable than his boss.

 

In the negotiations last year, shop stewards would seek his permission to
ask questions because he was incapable of asking them himself. Negotiators
for the gold companies found that "terribly scary".

 

Mr Mathunjwa does not respond well when his arguments are cut to pieces. In
the one meeting he attended during last year's gold negotiations he stopped
Chamber of Mines' chief negotiator Elize Strydom in mid-sentence, told her
she made him sick and left the table.

 

Whoever is benefiting from his leadership of AMCU, it is not his members on
the platinum mines. Since Marikana, nothing much has changed for them.

 

They've received no increases. Wage negotiations have deadlocked because he
has refused to budge from his R12,500 demand for entry-level workers who
presently get less than half that.

 

Current offers from the different platinum companies are from 8% to 8.5% a
year for two years. Had he accepted this, his members would have been a lot
closer to getting the R12,500 he promised them but has done so little to
deliver.

 

 

From:
http://www.bdlive.co.za/national/labour/2014/01/26/honeymoon-may-be-over-for
-AMCU-boss

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to