UmsebenziOnlineBig.jpg

 


Umsebenzi Online, Volume 13, No. 9, 6 March 2014



In this Issue:

*       Israel's 'South Africa' moment is here <>  
*       Defend the public health-care system!' <>  

 


 

 


Red Alert:

 

Israel's 'South Africa' moment is here

umsebenzi_hand

 

By Cde Solly Mapaila

 

Would South Africa have been less of an Apartheid state if blacks and whites
could swim at the same beaches - but laws like the 1913 Land Act, Group
Areas Act, Mixed Marriages Law, pass laws, and Bantu education still
existed? Absurd as that argument is, that is exactly what Israel's
apologists are asking us to believe.

 

When Israel is called an Apartheid state, its defenders - including some
South Africans - cite the absence of state-sanctioned racial segregation,
and the presence of Palestinian parliamentarians, as evidence that Israel is
not an Apartheid state.

 

In doing so, they insult South Africans and our struggle against Apartheid.
Apartheid was much more than racial segregation, and whether there was a
black Miss South Africa. The struggle against Apartheid was not just about
the right of blacks and whites to be able to sit on the same park benches.
As the sham tricameral system showed, neither was it only about obtaining
the right to 'vote'. It was also about access to land, equal education,
freedom of movement and political association, and equal infrastructure and
services. It was grand Apartheid that truly oppressed and subjugated, while
'petty' Apartheid - designed to humiliate and dehumanise - rubbed salt in
the wound.

 

It is ridiculous that Israel's propagandists see Apartheid purely in South
African terms, and conveniently ignore that Apartheid was defined in
international law in 1973, when the UN adopted the International Convention
on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (ICSPCA).
According to ICSPA, Apartheid involves "inhuman acts" committed for the
purpose of "establishing and maintaining domination by one group" over
another, and systematically oppressing them.

 

This Convention is a 'universal instrument', applicable to Apartheid systems
anywhere in the world, and offers examples of these inhuman acts, noting
that they might be 'similar' to acts in South Africa but need not be
identical.

 

In line with ICSPA, Israel is not replicating South African apartheid, but
Israel's occupation and Apartheid system is established on the same three
'pillars' that South African Apartheid was built on. A Human Sciences
Research Council (HSRC) study in 2009 found that, like Apartheid South
Africa, Israeli authorities have demarcated its population into racial
groups; segregated them into geographic areas; and instituted draconian
security laws and policies to maintain Apartheid.

 

New laws and bills promulgated in the Knesset, seek to dispossess Arab
citizens of Israel and exclude them from the land; turn their citizenship
from a right into a conditional privilege; limit the ability of Arab
citizens and their parliamentary representatives to participate in the
political life of the country; criminalize political acts or speech that
question the Jewish or Zionist nature of the state; and privilege Jewish
citizens in the allocation of state resources. All in the name of
'security'.

 

In the Bantustans of the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), ethnicity
determines which roads you can use, whether you must cross a checkpoint, how
much water you get, whether you need a pass, if your home will be
demolished, and what kind of legal system you will face. Again, necessary
for the security of the Jewish State.

 

Israel also continues to be in an official 'state of emergency' which the
Knesset has renewed every year since 1948. There are almost 200 regulations
enabling the state to legally declare any part of the country, including the
OPT, a closed military area, exercise administrative arrest without trial,
expel, and even execute citizens. All in the name of 'security', of course.

 

Like Apartheid South Africa's propagandists, Israel's spin doctors depict
the country as a progressive state with vast natural resources, a booming
capitalist economy, and a rich cultural life with ties to the West. In an
attempt to deflect attention from the Apartheid issue and instead focus on
"positive" traits, Israel claims it wants to share its agricultural and
technology know-how with its neighbours. Israel's PR campaign, particularly
in South Africa, is based on the "What can we do for you?" approach.

 

In February 2010, former Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, warned that
Israel's failure to make peace with the Palestinians could possibly result
in an Apartheid regime. In February 2011, former Israeli Ambassador to South
Africa, Ilan Baruch, cautioned that the collapse of Apartheid South Africa
was an important lesson for modern-day Israel.

 

The people of Palestine are stateless, they suffer the worst of racist
oppression and colonialism of a special type, capitalist exploitation and
imperialist domination, all presided upon by Israel, which by the way enjoys
automatic and active support from the United States of America, its
subordinate allies and puppet regimes. No human being deserves the
devastation of life and the atrocities experienced by the Palestinian people
who are denied a fundamental right to have a viable state in peaceful
co-existence with the other communities of states.

 

Baruch's warning should be heeded. The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions
(BDS) campaign against Israel is growing. As we head into Israeli Apartheid
Week, Israel's 'South Africa moment' is here.

 

The SACP has been fully behind the strategic objectives, campaign and goal
of the Israel Apartheid Week which aim to express solidarity for the
liberation and socio-economic and cultural emancipation of the people of
Palestine and the restitution of their land and dignity.

 

Cde. Solly Mapaila is SACP 2nd Deputy General Secretary

 

 


 

 

 

'Defend the public health-care system!'

 

 

Health is of critical importance in the life of humanity, the wellbeing of
society and human development. However, there are forces that act against
access to universal quality health care. In recent weeks, an agenda in
opposition to making medication affordable and accessible, involving a USA,
Washington, DC based lobby group, coalescing with trans-national
pharmaceutical corporations operating in South Africa and elsewhere, was
exposed in a leaked email. Society needs to stand up and defend itself from
these forces, which are motivated absolutely by nothing else except
super-profit-maximisation as opposed to human life. But these are not the
only players in the scene who are lined up against life. Below we provide an
excerpt of SACP Central Committee statement addressing another set of life's
hostile forces.

 

SACP Central Committee, 28 February - 2 March 2014: Excerpt on health.

 

A precondition for the rolling out of a National Health Insurance Scheme is
the strengthening of the existing public health system. But, if anything,
the predatory role of private hospitals, the pricing of medicines and
medical interventions, moonlighting of public sector nurses and doctors in
the private sector, and the outsourcing of services in public hospitals, are
all contributing to the erosion of our public health-care system.

 

What is worse, some of our own state development finance institutions,
working closely with narrow BEE tenderpreneurs, have been actively financing
private hospitals. The National Empowerment Fund recently financed one black
health entrepreneur some R100million to establish private hospitals. The
Industrial Development Corporation declined to fund the planned Nelson
Mandela Children`s Hospital on the grounds that it would be insufficiently
profitable, while funding a private BEE hospital in Shoshanguve. It is a
scandal that during the era of minority rule an outstanding children`s
hospital - Red Cross Children`s Hospital, serving all children rich and poor
- could have been established, while post-1994 we falter. Our own public
DFIs cannot be complicit in the erosion of the public health-care system.

 

Private hospitals are profitable because they service the 17% of South
Africans covered by medical aid schemes. But the private hospitals are so
greedy and their prices so exorbitant that the medical aid schemes
themselves are battling. Even those of the major private corporations in SA
are struggling. SASOL`s medical aid, for instance, is reportedly being
charged R4500 for a male circumcision, whereas the procedure costs the state
R400, and is provided free. The human papillomavirus inoculation which the
state will be providing free to all girl children in Grade 4 will cost the
state R140 a shot, whereas the private health care system charges R1000.

 

There are countless more examples of this gross over-charging that takes
health-care far out of reach of the majority of South Africans and
increasingly poaches health professionals from the public sector. The three
major private hospital companies are all listed on the JSE. In other words,
the whole system is skewed towards speculative investment and not the
welfare of citizens. Health-care is a fundamental human right - it is an
outrage that it is becoming more, not less, of a commodity.

 

It is in this context that the SACP congratulates the Competition Commission
for establishing an inquiry into health care costs. Working in consultation
with COSATU, its affiliates and community organisations, the SACP will seek
to mobilise communities to ensure that those who have suffered from gross
private health-care exploitation come forward to tell their stories before
the inquiry.

 

The full statement of the SACP Central Committee 28 February - 2 March 2014
was released by SACP on 2 March 2014.

 

See more at: http://www.sacp.org.za/main.php?ID=4233

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

<<image001.jpg>>

<<image002.gif>>

Reply via email to