SACPblackStar.jpg
South African Communist Party, 20 March 2014 The Public Protector's Report into Nkandla upgrades SACP's preliminary response Yesterday the Public Protector released a report of investigation into the security upgrades at President Jacob Zuma's Nkandla residence. We welcome the fact that at last this report has been released. The SACP will study the report in detail and respond comprehensively at an appropriate time, save for some preliminary observations for now. Crucial observations The Public Protector's report, consistent with the report of the government's Inter-Ministerial Task Team, confirms several crucial findings. In the first place the President never requested for security evaluations and any upgrades by the state at his Nkandla residence. The President had his own upgrades taking place prior to the security installations by the state. No state resources were used to build any house for the President or any member of his family at his residence. The President never misled the Parliament when he said that the state never built his and any of his family members any house, and that his family was responsible for payment of all the houses they built for themselves at his residence. The President was not and did not have to be involved operationally and in any line function in the project undertaken by the state. Neither did he influence or prefer the appointment of any service provider or contractor. Negative impact on principles of justice The SACP is extremely concerned at the manner in which the Public Protector has handled this investigation which, we believe, has compromised certain fundamental principles of justice, fairness and therefore the credibility of the investigation. The use of the media in particular to leak the earlier report and the habit of making comments on an incomplete process have all negatively affected and unnecessarily cast aspersions on the person of President Jacob Zuma. The media was "locked up" in a board room approximately for about 3 hours to go through the final report prior to its release via a press conference; whilst the affected persons were never given such adequate opportunity. Before the Public Protector released the report, already journalists were tweeting its contents. The Public Protector does not report to the media, but to Parliament, and therefore her media driven strategy is seriously flawed and shows a complete misunderstanding of the Office of the Public Protector. We reiterate abuses of power and the leaks from the Office of the Public Protector must be investigated and addressed decisively. The timing of the release of the report cannot be ignored Like the Public Protector's comments that have since August 2012 become increasingly laced with those of one opposition party that she addressed at its Women's Day Rally, the timing of the release of the report is consistent with frequent utterances by the same party. This cannot be viewed in isolation from electioneering agendas. The release of the report some seven weeks before the elections is a matter of serious concern to us. The duration spent by the Public Protector in what constituted a parallel investigation is lengthy compared to the Inter-Ministerial Task Team's investigation into the same matter. The team timeously conducted, completed and released its report. Action to process its recommendations was similarly implemented decisively. Already the President signed a proclamation for the Special Investigation Unit to take up matters that were referred to it by recommendations of the Inter-Ministerial Task Team report. Nothing in the Public Protector's report suggests the findings and recommendations of the Inter-Ministerial Task Team report were wrong. The recommendations of the Inter-Ministerial Task Team report are broader and address structural issues. As the SACP we have accepted the Inter-Ministerial Task Team report. We commend government for taking a lead and reiterate that relevant government departments and state institutions must move decisively with appropriate speed in bringing any person who committed wrongdoing to book. Our commitment to fight against corruption The SACP reiterates its commitment to fighting against corruption and maladministration in both the public and private sectors. We shall continue to campaign against this scourge as part of our ongoing political work. We reaffirm our support to government institutions fighting against corruption. We will guard against the abuse or misuse or capture of these institutions including the Constitution's Chapter 9 institutions by political interests. We particularly commend the Minister of Public Works for the vigorous drive that he has been leading in dealing with corruption in that department. The department has over the years been plagued by widespread abuse of procurement processes, inflation of prices and unnecessary additional measures on projects. The department is on record about this, and its efforts to address the problem are visibly being implemented. The SACP reaffirms its commitment to the upholding of the rule of law. At the same time, we believe that matters relating to the security of the President are best suited to be handled by the relevant state security organs. Released by the SACP Contact: Alex Mashilo - Spokesperson Mobile: 082 9200 308 Office: 011 339 3621 Twitter: @2SACP Email: [email protected] -- -- You are subscribed. This footer can help you. Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this message. You can visit the group WEB SITE at http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, pages, files and membership. To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this address (repeat): [email protected] . --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "YCLSA Discussion Forum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<<image001.jpg>>
