Counterpunch.png

 

 

Ferguson <http://rt.com/usa/181248-ferguson-tear-gas-shots/> 

 

Organization is the Weapon of the Oppressed

 

 

Ajamu Nangwaya, Counterpunch, USA, 19 August 2014

 

“Leaders who do not act dialogically, but insist on imposing their decisions, 
do not organize the people–they manipulate them. They do not liberate, nor are 
they liberated: they oppress.”

– Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed     

 

The rebellion in Ferguson 
<http://www.stlamerican.com/news/editorials/article_aead72b4-2350-11e4-83a0-001a4bcf887a.html>
 , Missouri, against the killing of unarmed Afrikan American teenager Michael 
Brown has inspired me to reflect on the question of the organizing model versus 
mobilizing or mobilization model in the struggle for Afrikan liberation in 
North America as well as the broader humanistic fight for liberation from 
various forms of oppression. Organizing the oppressed for emancipation is the 
preferred approach to engaging them in the fight for their liberation as 
opposed to merely mobilizing them.  The rapid demise of the Occupy Movement and 
the scattering of the occupiers should be an objective lesson on the need for 
freedom seekers to become organizationally affiliated. Where are the tens of 
thousands of people who participated in the occupations in Canada and the 
United States? If I had to hazard a guess, I would argue that most of them are 
not in organizations that are committed to liquidating the various systems of 
oppression. They have gone back to doing the mundane activities of life that 
are not connected to movement-building. Essentially, they have been demobilized!

 

When I raised the issue of organizing the oppressed, this project is centrally 
focused on building the capacity of the people to become central actors on the 
stage of history or in the drama of emancipation. The socially marginalized are 
placed in organizational situations where they are equipped with the knowledge, 
skills and attitude to work for their own freedom and the construction of a 
transformed social reality.

 

Under the organizing model the people are the principal participants and 
decision-makers in the organizations and movements that are working for social 
change. The people are not seen as entities who are so ideologically 
underdeveloped that they need a revolutionary vanguard or dictatorship to lead 
them to the “New Jerusalem.” The supreme organizer and humanist Ella Baker 
<http://jmcstrategies.com/2009/01/21/ella-baker-a-political-organizers-organizer/>
  took the position that the masses will figure out the path to freedom in her 
popular assertion, “Give people light and they will find a way.”

 

This work of finding ‘a way’ is done in grassroots, participatory-democratic 
organizations, which are the principal instruments of self-determination for 
the oppressed. The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee 
<http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/enc_student_nonviolent_coordinating_committee_sncc/>
  (SNCC), a student-based civil rights group during the struggle against 
apartheid in the America South of the 1960s, employed the organizing model. 
SNCC focused on building local organizations with indigenous leadership that 
effected the struggle for freedom by, for, and of the people affected by white 
supremacy and capitalist exploitation.

 

These student organizers lived among the people and, in effect, committed 
‘class suicide’ 
<http://libcom.org/library/amilcar-cabrals-theory-class-suicide-and-revolutionary-socialism-tom-meisenhelder>
  by their existential unity with the people, as called for by the 
revolutionary Amilcar Cabral 
<http://www.sacp.org.za/docs/history/dadoo-19.html> . They weren’t like Martin 
Luther King and his Southern Christian Leadership Conference 
<http://mlk-kpp01.stanford.edu/index.php/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/enc_southern_christian_leadership_conference_sclc/>
  and other major civil rights organizations and their leaders who entered a 
local community for a march or demonstration with the media in tow. At the end 
of the event, they leave town with a demobilized population behind them. This 
is the mobilization model that shall be marked as “Exhibit A.”

 

The mobilizing or mobilization model of struggle seeks to bring the people out 
to support political actions that are conceived, planned, and executed by 
organizational or movement elite. The people are, essentially, extras in the 
drama of liberation with the leaders as the featured actors. The rank and file 
members or participants are without substantive voice and initiative. In the 
mainline trade unions of today as well as in much of the activities of other 
social movements, mobilization is the weapon of choice.   Included in the 
mobilization model is the spontaneous reaction of the oppressed to acts of 
state domination or violence from dominant social actors. For example, in some 
cases of police violence against Afrikans in Canada and the United States, the 
community is mobilized to march or demonstrate in protest against the incidents 
of injustice. There will even be the occasional rebellions or uprisings. But 
the passion for justice will predictably disappear in short order. The people’s 
attention will be distracted by routine, everyday activities until the next 
killing or episode of police brutality.

 

When organizations and movements favour mobilization, it is all about bringing 
the rank and file out to mass actions (the spectacles of resistance) such as 
rallies, demonstrations, pickets, strikes, and voter registration drives.  At 
the end of the event, the masses are sent back home to assume their stance as 
passive spectators in this elite management approach to liberation. The 
people’s will is represented by the leaders, because participatory democratic 
practices are not on the organizational menu. If the people’s bodies are 
needed, they will be summoned for the next action. The critical knowledge, 
skills and attitude that are used to effect resistance reside largely within 
the leadership. Even when the people are members of organizations, it is 
usually the elected leadership and a few people around it, and the paid 
staffers who do the bulk of the strategic and operational activities. They are 
the brain trust of the movement.

 

In the 1988 summer issue of the publication Breakthrough: Political Journal of 
Prairie Fire Organizing Committee 
<http://search.freedomarchives.org/search.php?s=breakthrough> , the late Kwame 
Ture 
<http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/2014/03/10/287320160/stokely-carmichael-a-philosopher-behind-the-black-power-movement>
  (formerly Stokely Carmichael), who served a term as chairperson of SNCC and a 
stint as Prime Minister of the Black Panther Party, had this to say about 
organizing and mobilization:

 

“There’s a difference between mobilization and organization and this difference 
must be properly understood. To be an organizer, one must be a mobilizer, but 
being a mobilizer doesn’t make you an organizer. Martin Luther King was one of 
the greatest mobilizers this century has seen, but until his death he was short 
on organizing. He came to double up on it just before his death, but he was 
very short on organizing. Many today who follow in his footsteps still take 
this path of mobilization rather than organization. Thus one of the errors of 
the 60s was the question of mobilization versus the question of organization.”

 

Invariably the mobilizing or mobilization model comes with the reliance on a 
supreme leader or a few individuals at the top of the organizational or 
movement leadership food chain. Ella Baker cautioned us about the will toward 
the preceding state of affairs:

 

“I have always felt it was a handicap for oppressed peoples to depend so 
largely upon a leader, because unfortunately in our culture, the charismatic 
leader usually becomes a leader because he has found a spot in the public 
limelight….”

 

The oppressed and movement organizations cannot keep on executing the same 
shopworn tactics, while expecting different outcomes.

 

Many organizations or people are using vigils, marches, rallies and 
demonstrations as spaces for emotional release. Emotional responses to material 
forces of oppression are insufficient for the job at hand. We must employ 
reason and emotion in a methodical, disciplined and planned manner that is 
backed by a vision in an organizational or social movement context.

 

We need to create or join organizations that are committed to fighting the 
systems of oppression that are materially impacting our lives. It is impossible 
to fight capitalist exploitation, police violence, the oppression of women, 
white supremacy, homophobia and other forms of dehumanization outside of 
collective action and organized structures – organizations and movements.

The 
exploitative systems of domination are structured and institutionalized. The 
masters or exploiters are very much aware of the value of organizations in 
maintaining the status quo. The oppressors’ army, police force, state 
bureaucracy, schools, media, companies, banks and prisons are organizations 
that are used to keep us in our place as Fanon’s “wretched of the earth” or 
“the damned.” Kwame Ture often made the following claim in his public education 
lectures, “Organization is the weapon of the oppressed. Afrikans are oppressed, 
because we are disorganized!” Our revolutionary ancestor’s assertion ought to 
be seen as a self-evident truth.

 

Let’s use this moment of grief and resistance in Ferguson to build radical or 
revolutionary organizations that will organize with the people around all of 
the issues raised below by comrade El Jones 
<http://rabble.ca/podcasts/shows/talking-radical-radio/2013/10/radical-poetry-interview-halifaxs-el-jones>
 , a poet, organizer and educator, in a Facebook status:

 

“We will be gathering to show solidarity for Mike Brown’s family and the 
citizens of Ferguson, and to stand against state violence against our 
communities and people. Stay tuned for details, date and time. We must come 
together to support each other and our communities against the dehumanization 
of Black people and the devaluing of our lives. We must stand against the 
criminalization of our youth, and for our right to exist, to walk on the 
street, to have futures, to live freely. We must stand against the occupying of 
our communities, the loss of opportunity, the marginalization and poverty and 
lack of access that condemn so many to prison, and the suffering of families 
and communities in a system that does not value Black life. We must organize 
ourselves in strength, love and solidarity, fight to build strong communities 
and futures, to support parents, and to protect our children.”

 

If we are not ready to be in organizations, we are just playing with ourselves 
(certainly a pleasurable act in the right context). However, in the situation 
of the quest for freedom and self-determination, self-interested pleasure, acts 
of petty bourgeois self-indulgence, and splendid isolation are liabilities.

 

The message within this Ethiopian proverb is timeless and accurate, “When 
spider webs unite, they can tie up a lion.” Let our action speaks louder than 
words in the call of the disenfranchised for unity, cooperation, and 
self-determination.  Our solidarity in action will emerge from us getting 
together in groups with a program of liberation.

 

Young people tend to be at the forefront of rebellions or uprisings, as we are 
witnessing in Ferguson, or we have observed in the recent mass protest in Egypt 
that brought down the Hosni Mubarak-led government. However, young people tend 
to be marginalized in the strategic leadership in organizations and social 
movements. It is critically important to systemically prepare younger comrades 
<http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/87920>  for the role of agents 
of revolutionary transformation in society. Afrikan young people will need to 
become more than the spark and driving force behind spontaneous and short-lived 
rebellions <http://www.ultra-com.org/project/new-ghettos-burning/> . They ought 
to become permanent organizers among the working-class, women and the racially 
oppressed so as to advance the social revolution. If the youth and the other 
alienated people of Ferguson and other cities and towns are committed to 
changing the status quo, they will need to form or join radical organizations 
and fully adopt the organizing model of resistance. Afrikan youth in the United 
States can draw on the legacy of young people-led organizations such as SNCC 
and the Black Panther Party, if they believe it is best to create their own 
autonomous revolutionary organizations. The widespread existence of sellout or 
compromised leadership 
<http://kasamaproject.org/threads/entry/sharpton-other-professional-pacifiers-we-re-hip-to-your-game>
  among the older established leaders might make independent youth-led 
organizations a compelling option. The youth-led rebellion in Ferguson is not 
taking direction from the traditional civic leaders 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/17/us/lack-of-leadership-and-a-generational-split-hinder-protests-in-ferguson.html?ref=us&_r=0>
  who are not seen as legitimate.

 

It is high time for the resistance to build effective and efficient 
organizations that are rooted in the needs and aspirations of the oppressed. 
Organizers ought to learn from the organizational or movement successes and 
mistakes of the past and the present in doing the monumental work of 
movement-building and creating the embryonic economic, political and social 
structures of the free, good, and just society (classless, stateless and 
self-managed). A prefigurative politics or building the road as we travel needs 
to be at the centre of social movement organizing in the 21st century.

 

—   Ajamu Nangwaya, Ph.D., is an educator and a journalistic activist. He is an 
organizer with the Network for the Elimination of Police Violence and the 
Network for Pan-Afrikan Solidarity.

 

 

From: 
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/08/19/ferguson-mobilization-and-organizing-the-resistance/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to