6. W E B Du Bois.png

 

New Age2.png

 

 

Busy with long-term changes

 

The National Development Plan is firmly institutionalised with strong
support

 

 

Dominic Tweedie, The New Age, Johannesburg, 8 May 2015

 

South Africa's national elections of May 7 last year confirmed a solid
overall 62% parliamentary and provincial majority for President Jacob Zuma
and the ANC in his second five-year term of office. 

 

What has he done with it so far? 

 

What are the prospects of continuing support for the liberation movement,
including in the local authority elections that are only a year away?

 

The South African media have paid little attention to the strategic thrust
of the Zuma administration that has been in office since 2009. 

 

Newspapers and electronic media have highlighted sensational events but the
large-scale, long-term changes being made by this government are hardly
discussed in forums accessible to the general public.

 

Future historians will be obliged to notice that the Zuma administration
has, since its inception, been primarily concerned with long-term changes.
Even now, the long-term progressive guidance of the government is felt and
appreciated by the public. 

 

That is why the slogan of "a good story to tell" is significant, although
furiously resented by a nagging opposition that has contributed very little
to the country's strategic gains.

 

Yet the ANC government's longer term successes remain at risk from electoral
challenges based on relatively minor and demagogic "issues", controversies,
"debacles" and "furores" loved by the popular mass media. 

 

The drama of South African politics comes from the imagined threat of such
an electoral upset, arising from a sudden surge of unpopularity, or from the
rival popularity of a new pretender. Such a change of government could be
followed by a reversal of the country's direction, and by the dismantling of
the strategic position carefully nurtured by the ANC administrations of
President Zuma and his three predecessors since 1994.

 

The ANC has remade South Africa from a pariah into a major diplomatic power,
with, for example, more embassies in Pretoria than in most other capital
cities in the world. 

 

South Africa's benevolent and progressive role in the continent (especially
via the AU and SADC), in the UN, and, since 2010, in the new BRICS group of
cooperating powers, is unprecedented and widely acknowledged. 

 

In its first year of office, the 2014 ANC government has continued to play
this role to the full. Repeated manifestations of xenophobia in our country
have not merely been left to burn out, as was the case before. 

 

The 2015 bouts of looting and violence have been positively extinguished by
law-enforcement, and by political leadership, so their magnitude and
duration have been far less than was previously the case, for example in
2008. 

 

In the internal economic development of the country, Zuma's government is,
in its second term, guiding what has become a large and sophisticated
economy through its growing pains, with confidence and determination. 

 

The National Planning Commission - created by the first Zuma administration
immediately after the 2009 general election - has this month been retired
with honour. 

 

Its National Development Plan is firmly institutionalised, with strong
support from all quarters, including opposition parties.

 

There is now no serious force in the country opposing the idea that the
government must govern in a planned way. 

 

In a world ravaged by the effects of anti-government neo-liberalism, this is
an extraordinary political achievement. It effectively reverses the
submissive 1996 Gear policy. 

 

At last, South Africa is a sovereign and independent state.

 

Huge developments are on the way in infrastructure, and in large-scale
productive industry, that will exploit the new infrastructure. 

 

The Zuma government is doing everything that it set out to do, but its work
could still be derailed.

 

A year ago, The New Age published an article headed "How ANC Gauteng lost
the plot". 

 

It pointed to the potential loss of control by the ANC of the three major
Gauteng metros of Tshwane, Johannesburg and Ekurhuleni. 

 

ANC support in these economic and administrative powerhouses of the country
was in the low 50% and trending lower. 

 

Loss of these three cities in the 2016 municipal elections could be the
beginning of the end for the ANC in the province and then nationally, with
the two richest provinces in opposition hands, and the ANC would be in a
precarious position at the end of the Zuma presidency in 2019.

 

The ANC had two years to rebuild its support in Gauteng before the 2016
local authority elections. Has it done so? The short answer is no. 

 

Only in the last week or two have there been signs that the ANC is beginning
to seriously work for electoral success in 2016. 

 

There are many examples in history of governments that did great,
foundational work, only to be rejected by a fickle electorate. 

 

Whether this will be the case in South Africa is the open question of the
Zuma administration. 

 

 

.    Dominic Tweedie is a member of the Gauteng provincial executive
committee of the South African Communist Party

 

 

 

From: http://tnaepaper.co.za/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to