Counterpunch.png

 

 

Democracy in Greece, and in USA

 

 

Paul Street, Counterpunch, USA, 2 July 2015

 

Democracy is among other things the rule of majority public opinion.
Plutocracy is the rule of the wealthy few over and against the popular
majority. To understand the different meanings of these two terms, you can
consult a dictionary. You can also look at the very different
decision-making processes on display regarding major political-economic
policies in Greece (the ancient homeland of the Western democratic ideal)
and the United States (the self-declared homeland and headquarters of
contemporary democracy).

 

Greece: “The People Must Decide”

 

Let’s start with Greece. It has been under pressure from international,
principally European creditors to slash social and other governmental
expenditures in order to qualify for a five-months extension of the
“economic rescue program” (bailout) that European authorities have advanced
to keep the nation’s financial system solvent. The austerity (“reform”)
proposals advanced by the European Commission, the European Central Bank,
and the International Monetary Fund (the “Troika”) include deregulation of
the Greek labor market, rollbacks in union power, pension cuts, and an
increase in taxes on basic food products. The Troika give Greece until
yesterday (I am writing on the morning of Wednesday, July 1, 2015) to accept
their terms or face default.

 

The “reforms” demanded by the European financial power elite promise to
further the economic humiliation of a nation that has been struggling for
years to meet the outrageous debt payment and austerity commands of its
northern creditors. As liberal U.S. economist Paul Krugman explained in the
New York Times two days ago, austerity has been a dead end for Greece,
denied (thanks to its membership in the Eurozone) the ability to reduce its
deficits by devaluing its currency:

 

“most…of what [Americans have] heard about Greek profligacy and
irresponsibility is false. Yes, the Greek government was spending beyond its
means in the late 2000s. But since then it has repeatedly slashed spending
and raised taxes [as required by the Troika]. Government employment has
fallen more than 25 percent, and pensions…have been cut sharply. If you add
up all the austerity measures, they have been more than enough to eliminate
the original deficit and turn it into a large surplus….So why didn’t this
happen? Because the Greek economy collapsed, largely as a result of those
very austerity measures, dragging revenues down with it….And this collapse,
in turn, had a lot to do with the euro, which trapped Greece in an economic
straitjacket. Cases of successful austerity, in which countries rein in
deficits without bringing on a depression, typically involve large currency
devaluations that make their exports more competitive. This is what
happened, for example, in Canada in the 1990s, and to an important extent
it’s what happened in Iceland more recently. But Greece, without its own
currency, didn’t have that option.”

 

A letter published yesterday by a number of international academics,
including former Archibishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, Slavoj Zizek, and
Judith Butler, notes that:

 

“Over the past five years, the EU and the IMF have imposed unprecedented
austerity on Greece. It has failed badly. The economy has shrunk by 26%,
unemployment has risen to 27%, youth unemployment to 60% and, the
debt-to-GDP ratio jumped from 120% to 180%. The economic catastrophe has led
to a humanitarian crisis, with more than 3 million people on or below the
poverty line…Against this background, the Greek people elected the
Syriza-led government on 25 January [2015] with a clear mandate to put an
end to austerity. In the ensuing negotiations, the government made it clear
that the future of Greece is in the Eurozone and the EU. The lenders,
however, insisted on the continuation of their failed recipe, refused to
discuss a write down of the debt – which the IMF is on record as considering
unviable – and finally, on 26 June, issued an ultimatum to Greece by means
of a non-negotiable package that would entrench austerity. This was followed
by a suspension of liquidity to the Greek banks and the imposition of
capital controls.”

 

The Troika’s ultimatum has been rejected by the Syriza government. That
government arose on a wave of anti-austerity sentiment first expressed in
years of mass street protests and then organized electorally in the form of
the Syriza Party.

 

Telling the democratically elected Syriza government to sign off on the
Troika’s “deal” is directing it to commit political suicide. Anti-austerity
has always been Syriza’s political raison d’être, as the Troika knows quite
well. So the ultimatum amounts to something of an attempted coup by the
financial command of neoliberal bureaucrats in Brussels, consistent with the
European “democracy deficit” that the left historian Tony Judt characterized
several years ago as “a sense that that decisions were being taken ‘there’
with unfortunate consequences ‘here’ and over which ‘we’ have no say.”

 

In the name of popular and national sovereignty and with an honest
understanding that rejecting the “reform” and bailout package offered by the
Europeans will entail costs, Greece’s 40-year old Prime Minister Alexis
Tsipras Syriza decided (imagine) to take the deal to the Greek citizenry.
Hours after meeting with European “leaders” at a summit in Brussels last
week, Tsipras announced that his government would put the European
creditors’ proposals up to a yay or nay popular referendum on Sunday, July
5th. “The people must decide,” Tsipras said. “We should respond to
authoritarianism and harsh austerity with democracy, calmly and decisively,”
Mr. Tsipras said. “Greece, the birthplace of democracy, should send a
resounding democratic message to the European and global community.”

 

Here’s the ballot measure that will be posed to the Greek people:

 

“Should the agreement plan submitted by the European Commission, European
Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund to the June 25 eurogroup
and consisting of two parts, which form their single proposal, be accepted?
The first document is titled ‘Reforms for the completion of the Current
Program and Beyond’ and the second ‘Preliminary Debt sustainability
Analysis.’”

 

“Not approved/NO”

 

“Approved/YES”

 

It’s a very basic act of democracy, taking a policy decision that will
impact millions of Greek workers and citizens to… well, to millions of Greek
workers and citizens.

 

European financial elites have reacted with shock and horror. The Eurozone
finance ministers’ Dutch leader Jeroen Dijsselbloem said he was “very
negatively surprised” by the Greek referendum decision. “That is a sad
decision for Greece because it has closed the door for further talks where
the door was still open in my mind,” Dijsselbloem added.

 

Germany’s hardline pro-austerity finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said
the Greek government had “ended the negotiations unilaterally.” The European
Commission chief, Jean-Claude Juncker, said he felt “betrayed” by the
“egotism” shown by Greece in failed debt talks. He accused Tsipras of
playing “liar’s poker.”

 

“Stunned,” New York Times correspondent James Yardley reported yesterday,
“[Tsipras’] fellow European leaders shut down negotiations, capped the
lifeline they had been providing Greece’s banks, angrily denounced him as
irresponsible and dishonest with his own people, and not so subtly suggested
that Greece needed a new government if it wanted to continue drawing
economic help.”

 

Jacob Funk Kierkegaard, a Senior Fellow at the arch-neoliberal Peterson
Institute for International Economics, responded to Tsipras’ referendum call
by saying that Greece was “joining countries we would normally regards as
failed states” (NYT, July 1, 2015).

 

The Troika has refused to extend the deadline for its latest bailout out
offer until the day of the historic Greek referendum. The vote will be held
nonetheless, with it being understood that a “No” victory very possibly
spells Greece’s exit from the Eurozone, that is, from the European Economic
Union. Without the European bailout, Greece will have no choice but to pay
pensioners and government employees and others in scrip, creating a parallel
national currency.

 

A “yes” victory would signal national submission to yet more
creditor-imposed Greek austerity, the very policy that has failed for five
years running. It would also likely lead to the departure of Tsipras.
Anti-austerity has always been his political raison d’être. With Western
(European and US) elites scrambling to prevent a “Grexit,” it seems possible
that a deal of some sort will still be possible despite European elite’s
chagrin at the horror of a democratic vote.

 

The key point for the purposes of this essay, however, is that
decision-making power is largely in the hands of the Greek populace.

 

The United States: a Different Kind of Failed State

 

Things could hardly be different in the United States. Look now at the
Trans-Pacific Partnership, a sweeping corporatist measure that U.S.President
Barack Obama, big business, and top Republicans have been slowly but surely
advancing in Washington. It’s a sweeping measure that would cover 40 percent
of the world’s economy and negatively impact the lives of millions of
Americans, their jobs, their quality of life.

 

Lawyers and lobbyists for giant multinational corporations have been working
it up and promoting it for nearly a decade. Beneath standard propagandistic
boilerplate about trade and jobs, the real thrust and significance of the
TPP is about strengthening global corporations’ ability to protect and
extend their intellectual property rights (drug patents, movie rights, and
the like) and to guarantee that they will be compensated by governments for
any profits they might lose from having to meet decent public labor and
environmental (and other) standards, something certain to discourage the
enactment and enforce of such standards. It’s all about what the Times calls
“investor protection.”

 

No wonder Obama has done everything he can to keep the TPP’s details under
wraps. The secrecy has been remarkable: U.S. Congresspersons and some of
their staff can see the TPP’s text only if they agree not to take notes or
discuss the details in public. No wonder Obama wanted Congress to give him
“fast-track” authority to force a yay or nay Congressional vote on the TPP,
with no time for careful consideration and no chance for revisions. (Under
fast-track rules, there’s no chance for delays or alterations: the pact must
be voted up or down in a very short time-frame.) And no wonder most of the
U.S. population is (all too irrelevantly) opposed to the TPP and fast track.

 

How about a national citizens’ referendum on these key political-economic
measures of great significance for “We the [American] People”? The very
notion of such a popular vote is absurd in the U.S. as currently
constituted. No such basic act of popular and national sovereignty is
remotely conceivable under America’s reigning model of corporate oligarchy.

 

Meanwhile the unpopular TPP is marching its way through the halls of
American so-called popular governance. After some momentary difficulties in
the U.S. House, fast-track just sailed quietly through the U.S. Congress
while the nation was focused on the gay marriage issue along with terrible
racist and gun violence and the Confederate Flag issue in the U.S. South.
All indications are that Obama and his Republican allies will succeed in
passing the TPP.

 

Sadly enough, there’s nothing particularly unusual about a
global-corporatist measure moving its way through the U.S. government over
and against popular opposition. Over the past three plus decades, the
mainstream political scientists Martin Gilens (Princeton) and Benjamin Page
(Northwestern) calmly reported last Fall, the U.S. political system has
become “an oligarchy,” where wealthy elites and their corporations “rule.”
Examining data from more than 1,800 different policy initiatives in the late
20th and early 21st centuries, Gilens and Page found that wealthy and
well-connected elites consistently steer the direction of the country,
regardless of or even against the will of the U.S. majority and regardless
of which party holds the White House or Congress. “The central point that
emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups
representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S.
government policy,” Gilens and Page wrote, “while mass-based interest groups
and average citizens have little or no independent influence.” As Gilens
explained to the liberal online journal Talking Points Memo (TPM) last year,
“ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government
does in the United States.” And that is no small part of why the United
States has entered a savagely unequal New Gilded Age in which the top 1
percent owns more wealth than the bottom 90 percent, along with a likely
comparable percentage of the nation’s “democratically elected” officials.

 

Such is the harsh reality of “really existing capitalist democracy” in the
U.S. —what Noam Chomsky calls “RECD, pronounced as ‘wrecked.’” Does this
perhaps qualify the United States as a “failed state”?

 

 

Paul Street’s latest book is They Rule: The 1% v. Democracy
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1612053270/counterpunchmaga>
(Paradigm, 2014). He can be reached at: [email protected].

 

 

From:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/07/02/the-birthplace-greece-v-the-farce-the
-united-states-of-democracy/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to