ANC Today.jpg

 

 

Steel is a key strategic industry for South Africa

 

 

Rob Davies, ANC Today, Johannesburg, 28 August 2015

 

The great global economic recession, which was triggered in 2008 by a
financial crisis arising from reckless lending by financial institutions in
the US, has had devastating and multiple impacts on the global economy. No
less for the South African economy, which has been impacted by a series of
exogenous economic 'shocks'. Taken together with a range of domestic shocks
- especially electricity supply constraints and prices - these external
factors have had very serious negative consequences for economic growth,
industrial development and job creation. These exogenous shocks include a
sharp decline in demand for exports in South Africa's traditional trading
partners and more recently, an end to the commodity super-cycle. The latter
has led to a significant decline in demand and prices for commodities, which
has and will in the near future; negatively impact the domestic mining
sector with considerable knock-on effects for the domestic economy. The
latest 'wave' in a series of negative shocks arises directly from the global
recession and impacts directly on the domestic steel industry.  Some of the
facts which provide a context to this crisis are as follows.

 

The global steel market has been dominated over the last decade by the
People's Republic of China which has installed capacity to produce 1.1
billion tons of steel. The PRC's steel exports account for well over half of
the global steel market - presently estimated as 800 million tons. However
the global recession and depressed demand all over the world has recently
led to a glut of steel in the global market.  In these circumstances and on
the back of low production costs highly competitive Chinese steel exports
have penetrated a large number of export markets in developed and developing
countries alike, including the South African steel market.

 

The South African steel industry is a key strategic industry, directly
representing 1,5% of the country's GDP and indirectly supporting strategic
sectors of the economy, the top five of which, it is estimated, support 15%
of GDP and employ 8 million people. Steel adds R26 billion to the economic
value of South Africa's iron ore and if this capacity was lost it would add
1% of GDP to South Africa's trade deficit. The domestic steel industry is
the only one in Sub-Saharan Africa; there is a positive correlation between
GDP and steel production for developing countries around the world and the
loss of our domestic steel production capacity would constitute a grave
threat to the growth drivers set out in the National Development Plan, the
Industrial Policy Action Plan and government's President Zuma's nine point
plan for economic growth.

 

It is estimated that the landed price of imported steel is currently 12%
below the cost of production averaged across a range of steel products in
South Africa, seriously undercutting the competitiveness of South African
producers and constituting a direct threat to the domestic steel production
sector. But global over production; depressed demand and import penetration
are only one side of the story. 

 

In 2003, to summarise a far more complex process, the democratic government
sold off its remaining equity in the former ISCOR to global steel producer
Arcelor-Mittal (AMSA), save for 7,9% held by the Industrial Development
Corporation.  AMSA accounts for 75% of domestic steel production.
Notwithstanding a highly advantageous cost plus 3% price for iron ore, and
in the face of every effort on the part of government to arrive at a
collaborative, mutually beneficial relationship aimed at  securing a steel
price in the lowest global quartile of steel prices, AMSA followed a policy
of import parity pricing (IPP) for its locally produced steel.  In so doing
the company extracted, what many independent analysts regard as excessive
returns, repatriated from South Africa. A lack of maintenance, capital
equipment investment and upgrades to ageing plants contributed to 7
catastrophic plant breakdowns at various of its plants across the country.
All these and other factors, taken together with the addition of significant
premiums by intermediate steel distributers, contributed to a lack of
competitiveness of domestic steel production capacity and uncompetitive
steel prices for downstream, labour intensive, domestic manufacturers and
users of steel products such as those involved in construction and
infrastructure. 

 

Under these circumstances, to increase competition in the steel market and
to lower prices for downstream manufacturer's government successfully
intervened to support a lowering of tariff protection for steel - an
intervention which did in fact bring down the aggregate domestic price of
steel by 5%. In addition, it is a matter of record that government continued
to do everything in its power to arrive at a more collaborative approach,
which would accommodate both a reasonable return on investment for steel
producers and serve the national interest.

 

Of course South Africa is not the only country that has been affected and
neither is it alone in its efforts to manage the problem. A large number of
countries have imposed or are in the process of imposing import tariff and
anti-dumping measures to protect their domestic steel production
capabilities. This includes the US, countries in the Eurozone and a range of
developing countries, some of whom are BRICS countries. In this complex
environment, in which vested interests most often have to be separated from
the national interest, how has and how will the South African government
respond?

 

Firstly certain processes before the Competition Commission must of
necessity remain confidential to protect the legal integrity and
independence of the outcomes which may flow therefrom. This is true also of
the numerous applications before the International Trade Administration
Commission - the independent body responsible for trade measures - tariffs
and anti-dumping specifically.

 

That said the South African government has and will step up all its efforts
to secure and grow the strategic steel sector in South Africa. These
measures will include in principal support for the tariff and anti-dumping
applications filed by steel producers with ITAC; conditional upon reaching
agreement with such producers that tariff protection does not lead to
inflated increases in steel prices, which could be highly deleterious to
downstream users. In short a solution which leads simply to 'passing the
problem on' to users will be no solution at all and a reciprocal package of
measures, which takes into consideration all critical factors, including the
vulnerability and needs of the other smaller steel mills is required.

 

In fact such an agreement, which is both fully compliant with the prescripts
of the law and secures binding commitments to other government concerns such
as maintenance and investment is not only possible but is in reach. Other
government support measures include:

 

The possible Designation of steel for local production to raise aggregate
domestic demand

stronger measures to limit the unencumbered export of scrap metal which both
increases the carbon intensity of the economy and is associated with the
theft of metal products from vital economic infrastructure and the illegal
export of precious metals from South Africa

Government and its agencies such as the IDC are also involved in a range of
interventions to address the concrete challenges faced by individual steel
producers. In the case of Highveld Steel for example, this includes a R150
million funding facility made available by the Industrial Development
Corporation (IDC) and processes through business rescue to identify viable
new technology and equity partners for the company.

 

Finally government is involved in a rigorous process to consult with and
engage with all the stakeholders - steel producers, traders and suppliers,
downstream users of steel and labour- in a collaborative effort to seek
concrete practical solutions to secure South Africa's strategic steel
production capabilities. It is imperative that such an approach secures
agreement and a set of interventions to weather the existing storm and place
the steel sector and the economy as a whole in the best possible position to
optimize the enormous opportunities that are evident when the market
conditions improve.

 

But if there is one lesson to emerge from this complex and sometimes highly
charged process it is this.  Working together in a collaborative, mutually
beneficial relationship will always bring better and even optimal results,
which marry the needs and economic realities of the private sector with the
national interests of the country - economic growth, re-industrialisation
and employment retention and creation.

 

 

.    Comrade Rob Davies is a member of the ANC NEC and is Minister of Trade
and Industry

 

 

From: http://www.anc.org.za/docs/anctoday/2015/at27.htm#art2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to