Did Obama and Putin Agree to Screw Erdogan?

 

 

"b", Moon of Alabama, 13 October 2015

 

It's official! The New York Times finally admits
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/13/world/middleeast/syria-russia-airstrikes.
html>  that the "CIA rebels" in Syria who received tons of TOW anti-tank
missiles are working under the field command of al-Qaeda/Jabhat al Nusra:

 

Rebel commanders scoffed when asked about reports of the delivery of 500
TOWs from Saudi Arabia, saying it was an insignificant number compared with
what is available. Saudi Arabia in 2013 ordered more than 13,000 of them.
Given that American weapons contracts require disclosure of the "end user,"
insurgents said they were being delivered with Washington's approval.

 

But, be assured, because these "CIA rebels" feel bad about it, they are
still "moderate" or somewhat "relative moderate".

 

Advancing alongside the Islamist groups, and sometimes aiding them, have
been several of the relatively secular groups, like the Free Syrian Army,
which have gained new prominence and status because of their access to the
TOWs.



...



It is a tactical alliance that Free Syrian Army commanders describe as an
uncomfortable marriage of necessity, because they cannot operate without the
consent of the larger and stronger Nusra Front. But Mr. Assad and his allies
cite the arrangement as proof that there is little difference between
insurgent groups, calling them all terrorists that are legitimate targets.

 

That these "relative secular" al-Qaeda auxiliaries are threatening suicide
attacks
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/12/syria-rebels-plan-suicide-
attacks-on-russians.html>  against Russians only confirms their secularism.
Judging from the reader comments to that NYT piece the U.S. people are
pretty aghast about this now openly admitted cooperation. They, and a
realist op-ed
<http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/13/opinion/a-road-to-damascus-via-moscow.htm
l>  in the NYT, call for cooperation with Russia and the Syrian government.

 

There may already be more cooperation between Russia and the U.S. than we
can see. At least that is what the Turkish President Erdogan perceives.

 

Yesterday the U.S. dropped 50 tons of small weapons and munition to Kurdish
fighters in north east Syria. According the U.S. justification for this
those Kurds along with some Arab Syrian tribals are supposed to attack the
Islamic State in Raqqa. (Those Arab tribals are by the way just a bunch of
worthless thieves. This according to
<http://www.voanews.com/content/analysts-say-us-syria-proxy-army-is-not-reli
able/2993704.html>  the Voice of America(!).) But the Kurds do not seem to
know about those Raqqa plans anyway. They have different aims
<http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/middle-east/article38868
126.html> :

 

U.S. officials hope the YPG will now turn its attention to Raqqa, the Syrian
city that is the de facto capital of the Islamic State, which lies just 60
miles south of Tal Abyad, a border town the YPG seized from the Islamic
State in June, with U.S. help.

 

But PYD spokesman Can said the Kurdish group's first priority is to link the
Kurdish enclave of Afrin, northwest of the Syrian city of Aleppo, with
Kobani, the Kurdish enclave northeast of Aleppo. That would mean clearing
the Islamic State from villages along 60 miles of the Turkey-Syria border,
in particular the border town of Jarablus.

 

"Our prime and most important goal is to liberate Jarablus and to connect
Kobani with Afrin," Can told McClatchy. Capturing Raqqa, a mostly Arab city,
is "not really" a PYD objective, he said. "Not for now," he said.

 

That is just as I suspected the Kurds to react. But why did the U.S.
officials claim that these Kurds and the collection of thieves would attack
Raqqa? Did they not coordinate with them or was that Raqqa story a ruse?

 

The Turks seem to assume such and they accuse the U.S. as well as Russia of
coordinating with the Kurds to seal the border with Turkey: Turkey warns
U.S., Russia against backing Kurdish militia in Syria
<http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/13/us-mideast-crisis-syria-turkey-id
USKCN0S71BF20151013?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter> 

 

Turkey has warned the United States and Russia it will not tolerate Kurdish
territorial gains by Kurdish militia close to its frontiers in north-western
Syria, two senior officials said.

 

"This is clear cut for us and there is no joking about it," one official
said of the possibility of Syrian Kurdish militia crossing the Euphrates to
extend control along Turkish borders from Iraq's Kurdistan region towards
the Mediterranean coast.


...



"The PYD has been getting closer with both the United States and Russia of
late. We view the PYD as a terrorist group and we want all countries to
consider the consequences of their cooperation," one of the Turkish
officials said.

 

Turkey suspects Russia, which launched air strikes in Syria two weeks ago,
has also been lending support to the YPG and PYD.

 

"With support from Russia, the PYD is trying to capture land between
Jarablus and Azaz, going west of the Euphrates. We will never accept this,"
the official said.

 

Is there now really coordination between Russia and the U.S. to seal the
Syrian-Turkish border which would cut off the Islamic State but also the
al-Qaeda "CIA rebels" from their supplies? This would destroy all Turkish
plans for Syria: a "safe zone" in Syria under Turkman control, a Sunni ruled
pipeline corridor
<http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/pipeline-politics-in-syria/>  from Qatar
to Europe, the Turkish-Ottoman annexation of Aleppo. Turkey would be pushed
back
<http://www.thenational.ae/world/europe/ankara-suicide-bombings-cast-long-sh
adow-over-turkeys-syria-policy>  into a secondary role.

 

Do Russia and the U.S. now really make common cause and decided to screw
Erdogan? This would make sense if the destruction of the Islamic State and
all other terrorists in Syria is the common aim. That would be a change in
the Obama administration's policy. Up to now it only helped
<http://levantreport.com/2015/05/19/2012-defense-intelligence-agency-documen
t-west-will-facilitate-rise-of-islamic-state-in-order-to-isolate-the-syrian-
regime/>  the "salafist principality" to grow and never seriously attacked
it.

 

And if there is such cooperation why does the U.S still deliver thousands of
TOWs to al-Qaeda which only kill more Syrians and prolong the fighting?

 

 

From:
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2015/10/obama-and-putin-agreed-to-screw-erdogan
.html#comments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to