Business Report.jpg

 

 

Glencore faces court over Gupta deal

 

 

Sechaba ka Nkosi, Business Report, Johannesburg, 1 February 2016

 

Mining giant Glencore is facing a legal challenge from a group of local
businessmen who had wanted to buy its Optimum coal mine after it went into
distress last year.

 

At least three sources, who are familiar with the developments, told
Business Report last week that the businessmen, led by the chairman of the
SA Mining Development Association, Peter Temane, acting in his personal
capacity, were preparing court documents to challenge the deal after their
bid was turned down in favour of Tegeta Exploration and Resources.

 

Peter Temane.jpg

 

This was despite the bid being much more lucrative than Tegeta's.

 

Tegeta is owned by the controversial Gupta family's Oakbay Investments.

 

According to the sources, Temane and his consortium offered to pay $200
million (R3.1 billion), or more than R3.2bn at the exchange rate towards the
end of last year.

 

But the consortium, which had tried to solicit support from the National
Union of Mineworkers (NUM), failed and the mine was subsequently bought by
Tegeta for R2.15bn in December.

 

"Temane and his group are busy finalising their papers because they feel
that their bid was overlooked in favour of the Guptas," said one. "From what
they had tabled, it looked like a good offer and a genuine effort to place
the mine in the hands of black South Africans.

 

"But after some backroom machinations, the group lost and that is why they
want to challenge it. So we should expect the high court challenge on Tegeta
soon."

 

Temane was not immediately available for comment.

 

But a NUM official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed the
approach by Temane and his consortium, and said the union had given its
tacit support because the consortium had guaranteed not to effect any
retrenchments.

 

The official said Temane and his consortium went as far as tabling a
proposal that would have empowered Optimum employees through an equity share
scheme.

 

"There was nothing wrong with what Peter (Temane) and his group were
proposing and their offer was much stronger than the Guptas," said the
official. "But they fought a losing battle because the Guptas are
well-connected."

 

Business rescue

 

Optimum coal mine was placed into business rescue proceedings in August
after Eskom and its parent company Optimum Holdings failed to renegotiate a
coal sales agreement.

 

At the time, Glencore had held a 60 percent stake in Optimum Holding, and
was embroiled in a stand-off with Eskom after the power utility presented it
with a demand for R2bn in penalties for below-specification coal quality.

 

Glencore put Optimum under business rescue after it argued that the
penalties would have meant supplying coal to Eskom to the end of the
contract at an effective price of R1 per ton.

 

Glencore said it could not drive a profit from selling coal to Eskom at the
agreed sales price of R150 a ton and proposed doubling it - a level that
would still result in loss-making from the mine - but which Eskom said it
could not stomach anyway.

 

Glencore was unavailable for comment yesterday.

 

Guptas' influence

 

But another source said Temane and his group had approached the business
rescue practitioner, Piers Marsden, with their bid, but fell flat to the
Guptas. "It was going to be difficult for Temane because of the Guptas'
tentacles in South Africa," said the source.

 

An ANC national executive committee member last week told Business Report
that there was growing concern within the party about the influence the
Gupta family, which has close links to President Jacob Zuma, wielded in
South Africa.

 

The member said some members had raised serious misgivings and warned that
the family would compromise the party. "We cannot look the other way while
people such as Ajay (Gupta) behave as if they are running the country," said
the member.

 

"This thing has to come to an end before it is too late because even if they
bidded fairly for the Optimum mine, their history in South Africa will
always leave question marks on whatever they do."

 

Coal supply

 

Optimum has supplied Hendrina with about 5.5 million tons of coal a year
since 1993 on a fixed-price contract - currently about R150 a ton.

 

On Friday, Eskom said that it had sourced coal from seven interim suppliers
to power its Arnot power station after its 40-year contract with Exxaro
Resources to supply the Arnot mine ended in December.

 

Eskom's group executive for generation, Matshela Koko, said the suppliers
were roped in to ensure the business continuity of Arnot.

 

"These interim suppliers will ensure security of coal supply pending the
conclusion of the long-term contract.

 

"One of these suppliers is Optimum, who has provided less than 15 percent of
the coal delivered to Arnot in January. All interim suppliers deliver coal
significantly below the previous Exxaro price - further demonstrating the
correctness of Eskom's decision to seek a new supplier," the company said.

 

He said Eskom was dismayed by accusations regarding any purchase of coal
from Optimum due to an ownership change to Tegeta.

 

But an Eskom engineer described the power utility's arguments about the
Glencore coal quality as "ridiculous" because the Hendrina power station,
which the company supplied, was designed to use low-quality coal.

 

"Power stations such as Hendrina, Kendal, Kriel and Tutuka use cheap coal so
that mining companies can export the rest to China and Germany.

 

So they have boilers that are designed to use Sim 1 coal, or coal that is as
close to the rock as possible."

 

* With additional reporting by Dineo Faku

 

 

From:
<http://www.iol.co.za/business/companies/glencore-faces-court-over-gupta-dea
l-1977955>
http://www.iol.co.za/business/companies/glencore-faces-court-over-gupta-deal
-1977955

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to