<https://studycircle.wikispaces.com/6+CU+Chris+Hani+Archive> CU Chris Hani
Archive.png

 

 

Interview by

 

Luli Callinicos

 

on 31 March 1993 with

 

Chris Hani

 

(Passage on the necessity of building organisation)

 

 

L          To what extent the ANC encouraged the anti-apartheid movement
across the board, but to what extent did the ANC actually initiate these
things, like for instance there has been a debate about to what extent SACTU
was right there from the beginning in 73 with the unions.  I think that
FOSATU, the young intellectuals, without a sense of history, probably had no
idea what was happening on the ground.

 

CH       You know, Luli, if there was any organisation which helped to
initiate the unity of the unions in this country, it is the ANC and the
alliance, in the 70s.  We actually, through SACTU, and through the CP,
established contacts with trade unionists in this country.  Before '73.
Quiet contacts.   I was in Lesotho from '75.  I was nearby and I was having
meetings with SAWU, with GAWU, with individuals from FOSATU.  As
individuals, not FOSATU as an organisation because FOSATU was not
monolithic.  In FOSATU we had elements which were pro SACTU, pro ANC, pro
CP.  You had syndicalists, you had elements which were hostile to the old
tradition of the trade union struggle, who were influenced by developments
in the ICFTU and other organisations.  So there was a struggle, say about
the tendencies within FOSATU.  But our approach was that whatever, we must
form one federation in SA.  We should bring together, weld together, all
these tendencies.  We should go to what was called the populist or
charterist unions, which were very close to the ANC Congress tradition.
Like SAAWU, like GAWU, like the Food and Canning Workers Union.  And then
weld them together with those which had been promoted and founded by
intellectuals, and as a result of the old Wages Commissions Board and
everything.  Influenced by the New Left.  Without traditions of struggle.
Those who didn't see the trade unions as a component part of the national
liberation struggle.  Our approach has always been to say the trade union
struggle is part of the broad national liberation struggle.  That the
victory of the national liberation struggle would actually create better
conditions for the workers in this country, and that the workers had to
participate in the struggle.  They would not have to remain on the sidelines
as spectators.  If in the final analysis we got a COSATU. It was because of
the influence we had built up.  The influence we had initiated into the
unions, especially SACTU.  SACTU, the CP and the ANC.  Because the strategy
of SACTU were strategies discussed between SACTU the CP and the ANC.  I am
happy to say that if today we have a militant revolutionary trade union
movement, it was because of the slow, grinding, pushing strategy of
influencing all these trade unions in FOSATU.  We didn't say because some
elements rejected us in FOSATU, we didn't say, no, no, no, to hell with
them.  We felt that it was our duty to engage ourselves in the struggle to
influence FOSATU.  To contest the influence with the New Left, with neo
liberal elements, because FOSATU was a mixture of all things.  And I think
ultimately we have succeeded in building a federation which ultimately
became close to the national liberation struggle.

 

L          Can you comment about the ANC's involvement in the civics?

 

CH       Yes.  In the 80s we felt that we needed to build the unity of our
people in the struggle against an imposed system of community councils.  The
community councils were seen by us as being undemocratic and being
manipulated by the state.  These were state organs ultimately.  And we also
detected that the community councils were set up by the regime in order to
destroy the influence of our movement in the townships and the locations.
And therefore as far back as '77, '78, after the banning of the Black
Consciousness (BC) movements, we felt that we needed to form civics so that
people could have a forum that cut across ideological affiliations, that cut
across political affiliations.  A movement that would bring into its fold
those who were pro PAC, pro BC, pro ANC, pro CP.  And that the key task and
the key demand was to fight for bread and butter issues that affected our
people.  You don't say to people, come and join us, we want to overthrow
this regime and have a democratic government.  You must be seen to be having
a concern for better housing, for electrification, for water, for lighting,
for streets, for schools.  And therefore we saw civics as a terrain of
struggle that would bring together all our people on the basis of their
common problems, their common concerns for a better life.  To mobilise
people on bread and butter issues.  I think the strategy worked well and saw
the emergence of the civic movement in the country, which became a key
element in the struggles in the Eastern Cape around PEBCO, in the Western
Cape around CAHAC, in the Transvaal around the Soweto Civic Association
which began to spread to other areas.  And I think that element of struggle,
the civic struggle, also made an important contribution in building a
vibrant mass democratic movement (MDM) which totally undermined the stooge
organisations, the puppet organisation of the councils, the urban councils,
the community councils.  1986 saw the beginning of the crisis of the
community councils when councillors began to resign as a result of the
strength and the power of the civic movement.  And as a result of MK
activities and the MDM, because it began to get isolated from many people in
the townships.  And now today, SANCO has become a national civic movement.
It has got a few teething problems, but it is there now.  It has really
impacted itself on the South African scene.  It is going to be an important
organ of civil society in future.  Defending the rights of ordinary citizens
in this country, black and white.  Where you would be having tax-based
municipalities, and where democracy is not going only to be seen at the
level of parliament and the cabinet, but we are going to be seeing democracy
vibrant at grassroot levels.

 

L          I have been writing about the civics and I have come across
people in Kagiso who say of a comrade, the first time they thought about
civic organisations is when somebody had a meeting, and talked to them about
it.  And then they disappeared.  They were actually a member of MK.  Were MK
moving around in the community...?

 

CH       You see, what I want to say, Luli, what people don't understand is
the fact that every MK comrade was trained not just to shoot or to place a
bomb.  Part of the integrated training of MK was part of being political
organisers.  They were taught that, look, you won't survive if you don't
create organisations around yourselves.  You have got to build up the
underground, you have got to build the mass movement, you have got to build
civics, you have got to help in the building of trade unions.  So wherever
MK comrades came into this country they would actually set up political
discussion groups.  To discuss strategies, to discuss the need to form
organisation, mass organisation.  That was our approach, that you won't
survive, you must be like the fish and for the fish to survive, you must
have water in which it will swim and survive.  So that was our approach, and
a lot of MK comrades participated in setting up student structures, civic
structures, trade union structures.  We said to them it is important for
every MK cadre to deepen the political consciousness of our people: To
produce leaders.  That it was not enough for you to just be a leader in that
area, you must reproduce yourself ten times and even twenty times.

 

L          Wasn't this risky for security?

 

CH       It was risky but it was necessary.  If they did not build this
organisation, they would have been isolated.  If you look at our survival
record, where there were organisations, civic, trade union and underground,
our people survived better.  Because they would be able to move from one
place to another assisted by people who were committed.  And this commitment
could only come out of proper politicisation.  It was risky, but it was a
risk that we had to undertake.

 

 

 

Visit the CU Chris Hani Archive at:

 

https://studycircle.wikispaces.com/6+CU+Chris+Hani+Archive

 

 

To download the above interview in full (40 pages, PDF), Click here
<http://studycircle.wikispaces.com/file/view/Chris%20Hani%20interview%2C%20J
ohannesburg%2C%2031%20March%201993%20by%20Luli%20Callinicos.pdf/578350787/Ch
ris%20Hani%20interview%2C%20Johannesburg%2C%2031%20March%201993%20by%20Luli%
20Callinicos.pdf> 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to