On 6/12/05, Pietro Speroni di Fenizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Few days ago I wrote an entry (see below) on how I
> thought delicious should let users tag url with an
> approximation of a tag cloud instead than with a tag
> set. This by considering as relevant the order of the
> tags.

Pietro:

I read your proposal with great interest, but I don't think the idea
of tagging with an approximated power set/cloud really matches the
expectation of how people actually tag. I know its not how I tag, if
it matters.

Essentially, the difficulty is the issue of "order" in terms of my
conception. If I tag a post as "fiction, prose, science," I'm not
trying to say that the fact its prose fiction is  more important than
the fact it's about science. On the contrary, I CAN'T say, because
that meaning is ultimately in the mind of the community as a whole,
not in my perception. By assuming my tag set is really a cloud, you're
injecting meaning where there really isn't any. Further, if Del
started assuming tags are input as clouds rather than sets, it would
actually limit my expressibility. I can't say, in such a context, that
an entity is equally two or more (or potentially a lot more) things;
there's an implicit hierarchy.

I thought we were trying to get away from preconceived hierarchies?

>From my perspective, the tag cloud as an entity can ONLY occur post
hoc, once the community has commented on the nature of the entity with
tag sets. Assuming (or even requiring) that the attached notation is a
cloud rather than a set invalidates a lot of the meaning you can
derive from the resulting hypercloud. It means LESS that, knowing the
annotations are clouds, that the word that comes up most often first
is "prose," rather than in the current state of tag sets, the word
"prose" occurs most frequently.

This isn't intended as a heavy criticism of the idea of tag clouds as
meaningful. On the contrary, I think the post hoc observation of tag
clouds over time is THE best means of understanding how the community
thinks of an entity. I disagree that its worth the cognitive overhead
to think of tagging with tag clouds rather than sets.

--
Alexander Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Proprietor of the Squid's Redoubt (http://chancel.org:8000/Redoubt)
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to