On 8/15/06, Joshua Schachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All kinds of subtlety here. For example, what to do if the site happens > to be down while we check it? What about respecting robots.txt etc?
Has anyone run an analysis on sample data to gauge the accuracies of typical detection strategies? Maybe Nature Publishing Group on their <http://connotea.org> data? just curious. this user's impressions: I find false alarms more annoying that misses. and I don't want to have to clean up after false alarms (you wouldn't make me do that, would you? tsk.). Give the user some element of choice of control, but make it spiffy enough* that the user doesn't have to make too many judgements**. * i.e. accurate and with really nice interface into data so user can look at it all at once without having to sift through results. ** which stresses consumers out. like grocery stores. -- sheila Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ydn-delicious/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
