* Joshua Schachter: > This indicates a hole in our api and/or thinking and will try to come up > with a reasonable short-term solution. > > Long-term I think this speaks to the fact that the for: store is > separate and probably shouldn't be. They should be "your" bookmarks, > just not created by you, and perhaps not visible in the default view. I > like the idea of other kinds of bookmarks, including for'd and retired. > Perhaps watched, commented on, voted on, so on and so forth. > > Joshua
I just noticed for: posts in the API. I guess the various .../posts/ URLs should now take a &user parameter. -- My English is poor, but my tailor is rich.
