Excerpts from Gary Poster's message of Wed May 23 05:59:26 -0700 2012: > On 05/22/2012 03:31 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Gary Poster's message of Tue May 22 10:46:13 -0700 2012: > >> On 05/22/2012 01:03 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > >>> Excerpts from Gary Poster's message of Tue May 22 07:31:26 -0700 2012: > >>>> Hi Clint. Thanks for your work in organizing this. > >>>> > >>>> For the buildbot slave and master charms, we'd like to make the yellow > >>>> squad, or perhaps the Launchpad team, the maintainer of these charms. > >>>> Do you see any issue with that? > >>>> > >>> > >>> None whatsoever, thats great news! We do need a mailing list that anyone > >>> can send to. > >>> > >>> Would you guys be interested in also becoming our first charmers sub-team? > >>> I'd like to showcase that you guys take care of that particular charm. > >> > >> I talked with Francis and Robert about what team ought to take charge of > >> this--launchpad or yellow. Actually, since we have no long-term > >> interest in buildbot, their take was that ~charmers would be the best > >> team to choose. > >> > >> Alternatively, we can keep it for now (~yellow, > >> [email protected]) if that helps you all out for a bit. If you > >> do publicize it in that case, be aware that we might toss it back to you > >> in a few months. If that future is alright with you, no problem. > >> > > > > If you guys won't have time to maintain it, then it will be removed. We're > > only going to be able to maintain critical infrastructure bits that > > are shared amongst many charms. Unfortunately, buildbot seems to be an > > island unto itself at the moment. > > Understood, Clint. We voted to go ahead and have it removed then. > > To be clear, our juju work also included the Python charm helpers and > the python-shell-toolbox package, and we hope that the buildbot decision > does not change your intent for those contributions. We're waiting on > you to have time to package these, and I know Graham and you have been > in touch about this. > > We use the python-shell-toolbox and intend to support it. > > We hope that you still feel that the Python charm helpers we contributed > are valuable even without the buildbot charm. The charm helpers depend > on the python-shell-toolbox. If you need us to support the charm helper > contributions, I believe we'd be willing and able, one way or another. >
Totally, its still very important that we have simple abstractions for those common tasks, and you guys nailed it. I've just been swamped with other urgent tasks. :p -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yellow Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yellow More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
