ROCKS seems swell if you can get it to run, but when we attempted to evaluate it but it refused to install on the 4 generic whitebox PCs that were purchased for it.
The next generation Y-HPC is going to kick some serious ass ;) On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 13:41 -0600, Randy Zagar wrote: > The Texas Advanced Computation Center at the University of Texas in > Austin uses ROCKS for their 1024-node Dell cluster. They seem to like > it. > > -RZ > > > Hi, > > At www.clusterbuilder.org/FAQ <http://www.clusterbuilder.org/FAQ> there is a > > question about what OS and cluster management software are the best for a > > cluster system. Does anyone have any advice on Yellow Dog Linux as a cluster > > OS? > > > > Here is the question: > > > > "I'm bulding a project for a cluster that consists on 64 machines running > > each 2x Dual Core AMD Opteron with 2GB of memory per core (8GB per machine). > > We already have everything else accounted for except for the software. We > > have serious doubts on what would be best for the OS and the cluster > > management software. The OS has to be open source. Please give me some > > advice on what you think you be the best performance solution for it. It > > doesn''t matter if it's not free. " > > > > Also, if anyone has any advice on cluster management software, please send > > it. I am trying to build a knowldgebase of different opinions on software. > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > yellowdog-general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general > HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com' > > !DSPAM:437e2eaf206531280815724! _______________________________________________ yellowdog-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.terrasoftsolutions.com/mailman/listinfo/yellowdog-general HINT: to Google archives, try '<keywords> site:terrasoftsolutions.com'
