Hi Creighton,

Indeed probably the simplest way to do it would to write a minimal subset of the standard C library (the bits that Yhc uses) and link yhi against it. You could simply use empty definitions for the bits you didn't intend to use.

Cheers

Tom

Creighton Hogg wrote:
Hello,
So I admit that I'm not really that familiar with how Yhc works yet, but I was wondering if anyone had ever tried/considered making the Yhc runtime work on bare metal? It seems like this would just involve using a modified version of the BCKernel but everything else should be able to stay the same since the rest involves compiling to byte code? I have no idea how hard that is, but it seems like it'd be almost more feasible than reworking h0p/House to work with more recent GHCs.

Cheers,
Creighton


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Yhc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/yhc

_______________________________________________
Yhc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/yhc

Reply via email to