Hi
> > Yeah in line with Neal's suggestion, I had added a FakeString module
> > that was imported by SysDeps as PackedString and just provided
> > unpackPS = id
> > and
> > packString = id
> > I had done something silly where that first one didn't build properly,
> > but now that that's fixed I'm getting errors I don't really understand
> > on 5 of the tests. I'll probably look at them tonight & ask questions
> > about how chunks of the code work.
>
> hmm I would have thought that String and PackedString should behave
> identical, apart from the 'packedness'. Still there could be some subtle
> semantic difference ...
Yeah, a several of the five failures were caused by running out of memory.
Now, I thought String vs. PackedString shouldn't be that much of a
difference anymore? Are there strictness differences between the two that
could be causing the String version to build up huge thunks? Maybe I'll be
a wench and change it to ByteString.Char8 and see what happens.
Perhaps:
packString x = sum (map ord x) `seq` x
Will give you what you need. That function should have the same
strictness as the original packString.
Thanks
Neil
_______________________________________________
Yhc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/yhc
