Excerpts from Jean-Philippe Bernardy's message of Wed Oct 01 11:42:52 +0200 2008: > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Nicolas Pouillard > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Derive is very fragile in as a standalone tool (I had to tune imports > >> and a few other things), > >> so re-deriving is a bit of an arcane process, and is therefore not > >> integrated with the build. > >> the template-haskell backend is out of the question (for the moment) > >> because it requires to > >> use the same version of bytestring as GHC. This might be ok when the > >> Haskell Platform is > >> done. > > > > I agree that a TH backend would better integrate, however people have to > > concentrate on a tool for deriving custom things not dozen. > > I meant that the Data.Derive package has a TH backend ready for use.
Nice I was to aware of it! > > BTW have > > you tried DrIFT ? > > A long time ago; before Binary was introduced. I choose Derive because it > seems better supported. Indeed TH is a kind of proof... -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
