On 12/27/19, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote: > To me it seems that the SDK is the wrong kind of delivery to begin with (as > it is basically a frozen target image configuration without the ability to > customize the entire system build; Yocto SDKs are meant for application > development). What you need is a hardware BSP meta-layer with ability to > integrate the layer into your private build configurations. > > If you can get the OEM to agree to this, we can discuss acceptance criteria > for such a layer. > > Alex
I think that was their intention from the start. they wanted to only give their customer the ability to produce user level apps, without modifying the system, but for our enterprise that is unrealistic. They do provide a meta-vendor layer, but the stuff in it points to private git repos and stuff like systemd startup scripts, so if it ends up not in the cache then the build will fail unless the build is done from within their corporate intranet. So no, they would definitely NOT meet any real acceptance criteria.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#47830): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/47830 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/69288358/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
