Hello, I want to ask if there is some best practice or recommendation on how to build multiple FIT images with different initramfs image. We need more FIT images with a different set of packages to support different use cases(development image, production test image, etc.).
As the INITRAMFS_IMAGE variable is set in the machine configuration, we defined more machines with different INITRAMFS_IMAGE value. I think this is abusing of machine configuration. I found a similar question here on the mailing list (https://www.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2017-August/037676.html), where Christian describes his solution - adjusting kernel.bbclass and kernel-fitimage.bbclass and creating a new variable INITRAMFS_IMAGES. However, it wasn't integrated into YP. To summarize, is there a better/recommended solution for building multiple FIT images with different initramfs image, then abusing the MACHINE configuration, or adjusting kernel.bbclass and kernel-fitimage.bbclass by myself? Thank You and Best Regards, Vlado Motyka Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is privileged and confidential and for the use of the addressee only. Should you have received this e-mail in error please notify us by replying directly to the sender or by sending a message to i...@kistler.com. Unauthorised dissemination, disclosure or copying of the contents of this e-mail, or any similar action, is prohibited.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#48910): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/48910 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/72513743/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
