> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On > Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: den 3 juni 2020 16:40 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [yocto] devtool modify issues with ubuntu 20 and fedora core > 32 > > > On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:43 AM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 11:06 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > >> I'm not sure if this is distro specific. _PYTHON_SYSCONFIGDATA_NAME > >> is set from python3native.bbclass so that native python can pick up > >> target configuration, and if the target configuration is not there > >> (it comes with target python3 build), then there will be a failure > >> like the above. How does your recipe look like? Do you get the same > >> failure if you try devtool modify in a plain yocto environment (not > >> the SDK)? > > > > Chris and I did talk about this on irc: > > > > (22:33:38) kergoth: actually fails even without prserv enabled at all > > (22:34:07) kergoth: just import pydoc will call sysconfig.get_path() > which enters that codepath > > (22:34:22) kergoth: so calling anything that imports bb from a task > will explode > > (22:34:33) kergoth: cooker pulls in xmlrpc, which pulls in pydoc > > (22:34:41) kergoth: breaks devtool modify > > (22:37:04) RP: kergoth: right, it was more about it being a hint at the > kinds of issues > > (22:37:11) kergoth: ah, fair enough > > (22:37:26) kergoth: i expect we may need to change how python3native is > doing its thing > > (22:42:55) RP: kergoth: quite possibly. I never liked that fix and > suspected there was more to it :/ > > (23:21:39) kergoth: RP: maybe something like > https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded- > core/compare/master...kergoth:python-sysconfig ? i'll mull it over. makes > sense, though. we rename _sysconfig only for the python3-native recipe, > so it'd make sense for us to only change that name for our python, not > any python run from the task > > (23:21:49) kergoth: _sysconfigdata, that is > > (23:46:35) RP: kergoth: something like that would make sense, yes > > > > Chris: Did you come to any conclusion? > > I tested the initial linked prototype but it caused failures in the glib > build so it must have been missing something. I haven’t had time this > week to look back into it yet. > > > Does someone want to send a patch? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard
Was there any progress on this? I guess the failures in glib stems from it unsetting _PYTHON_SYSCONFIGDATA_NAME, which doesn't have any effect when it is set via the wrapper. There are a couple of recipes and bbclasses that do this. //Peter
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#49640): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/49640 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/74637733/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
