Note, this is still happening.  Using meta-mingw w/ gatesgarth to build, and
including libgcrypt I get the same failure.  The failure resolves with
"--disable-amd64-as-feature-detection".

Looking at the code, I don't really understand it, but there are some lines
after that which may be more indicative of the actual error:

../../libgcrypt-1.8.6/cipher/rijndael.c: In function 'do_encrypt':
../../libgcrypt-1.8.6/cipher/rijndael-tables.h:103:24: error: expected ']'
before '.' token
  103 | #define encT enc_tables.T
      |                        ^
../../libgcrypt-1.8.6/cipher/rijndael.c:775:20: note: in expansion of macro 
'encT'
  775 |                   [encT] "r" (encT)
      |                    ^~~~
../../libgcrypt-1.8.6/cipher/rijndael.c:776:17: error: undefined named operand
'encT'
  776 |                 : "cc", "memory", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11");
      |                 ^

I can't find any difference in generated content anywhere, only that the
function (.c) that is failing seems to have a comments it's loading something
for use w/ a SysV style function:

# else
  /* Call SystemV ABI function without storing non-volatile XMM registers,
   * as target function does not use vector instruction sets. */
  const void *key = ctx->keyschenc;
  uintptr_t rounds = ctx->rounds;  
  uintptr_t ret;
  asm volatile ("movq %[encT], %%r8\n\t"
                "callq *%[ret]\n\t"
                : [ret] "=a" (ret),
                  "+D" (key),
                  "+S" (bx),
                  "+d" (ax),
                  "+c" (rounds)
                : "0" (_gcry_aes_amd64_encrypt_block),

As far as my configuration (all gatesgarth):

conf/bblayers.conf:
BBLAYERS ?= " \
    /scratch2/mhatle/2021/sources/poky/meta \
    /scratch2/mhatle/2021/sources/poky/meta-poky \
    /scratch2/mhatle/2021/sources/meta-mingw \
    /scratch2/mhatle/2021/sources/poky/../meta-xilinx/meta-xilinx-bsp \
    /scratch2/mhatle/2021/sources/poky/../meta-xilinx-tools \
    /scratch2/mhatle/2021/sources/poky/../meta-openembedded/meta-python \
    /scratch2/mhatle/2021/sources/poky/../meta-openembedded/meta-oe \
"

DISTRO=nodistro MACHINE=zynqmp-generic SDKMACHINE=x86_64-mingw32 bitbake
nativesdk-libgcrypt

On 3/3/20 9:19 AM, Joshua Watt wrote:
> 
> On 2/25/20 1:32 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>
>> On 2/25/20 12:36 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:02:14PM -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>>> amd64 optimization when using with mingw32 sometimes results in:
>>>>
>>>> | ../../libgcrypt-1.8.4/cipher/rijndael-tables.h:103:24: error: expected
>>>> ']' before '.' token
>>>> |  103 | #define encT enc_tables.T
>>>> ...
>>> Please send a complete build log, this looks like a parallel build
>>> failure where some .c is compiled before some header it uses is
>>> fully generated (or something similar).
>> I'll reply with a private email to where you can get a copy of the build 
>> directory.
>>
>>>> --- a/recipes-support/libgcrypt/libgcrypt_%.bbappend
>>>> +++ b/recipes-support/libgcrypt/libgcrypt_%.bbappend
>>>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>>>> +EXTRA_OECONF_append_mingw32 = " --disable-amd64-as-feature-detection"
>>>> ...
>>> I assume PARALLEL_MAKE = "" would also work instead?
>> I tried this and it didn't appear to make a difference.  I only see the 
>> problem
>> when building for mingw32.
> 
> Did we ever figure out what was causing this? It does appear to be some 
> sort of race condition at the moment, and I'm surprised we haven't seen 
> it on the autobuilder (we have pretty good test coverage for meta-mingw 
> there).
> 
>>
>> I've never seen any issues for any other SDK target.
>>
>> --Mark
>>
>>> cu
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>> 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#51796): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/51796
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/71538286/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to