Actually, I found the upstream patch I backported, which you're probably
better off using (same diff though).

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/773330/

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 2:26 AM Joel A Cohen via lists.yoctoproject.org
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not sure if this is your issue, but I had a similar issue ilog2 and
> the disassembler and fixed it by backporting this patch.
>
> No guarantees, but perhaps it will help.
>
> --Aaron
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:51 PM Jonas Vautherin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot for the advice! However, I can't seem to find a `const` that
>> I can simply remove. To give more context, here is the log output around
>> such an error (it seems like it is often surrounded by this log2.h warning,
>> by the way):
>>
>> | In file included from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/kernel.h:11,
>>> |                  from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/kallsyms.h:9,
>>> |                  from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/ftrace.h:10,
>>> |                  from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/kernel/extable.c:18:
>>> |
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/log2.h:22:1:
>>> warning: ignoring attribute 'noreturn' because it conflicts with attribute
>>> 'const' [-Wattributes]
>>> |    22 | int ____ilog2_NaN(void);
>>> |       | ^~~
>>> |   CC      fs/fat/dir.o
>>> | In file included from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/kernel.h:11,
>>> |                  from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/list.h:8,
>>> |                  from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/module.h:9,
>>> |                  from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/fs/fat/dir.c:16:
>>> |
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/log2.h:22:1:
>>> warning: ignoring attribute 'noreturn' because it conflicts with attribute
>>> 'const' [-Wattributes]
>>> |    22 | int ____ilog2_NaN(void);
>>> |       | ^~~
>>> |   CC      block/deadline-iosched.o
>>> | In file included from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/kernel.h:11,
>>> |                  from
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/block/deadline-iosched.c:6:
>>> |
>>> /home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/include/linux/log2.h:22:1:
>>> warning: ignoring attribute 'noreturn' because it conflicts with attribute
>>> 'const' [-Wattributes]
>>> |    22 | int ____ilog2_NaN(void);
>>> |       | ^~~
>>> | /tmp/cc52vFrQ.s: Assembler messages:
>>> | /tmp/cc52vFrQ.s:2683: Error: .err encountered
>>> | /tmp/cc52vFrQ.s:2927: Error: .err encountered
>>> |   LD      sound/sparc/built-in.o
>>> |   LD      sound/spi/built-in.o
>>> | make[3]: ***
>>> [/home/jones/Documents/yocto/poky/build/tmp/work-shared/skycontroller3/kernel-source/scripts/Makefile.build:257:
>>> block/scsi_ioctl.o] Error 1
>>>
>>
>> I pasted the full output here, if that can help:
>> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/KqN8nVWmvv/. The lines that seem to get the
>> log2 warning are:
>>
>> ```
>> extern __attribute__((const, noreturn))
>> int ____ilog2_NaN(void);
>>  ```
>>
>> So there is a const there, but well... not sure what to do with it :-).
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:00 AM Diego Santa Cruz <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]> *On
>>> Behalf Of *Jonas Vautherin via lists.yoctoproject.org
>>> *Sent:* 24 January 2021 14:30
>>> *To:* Jonas Vautherin <[email protected]>
>>> *Cc:* Paul Barker <[email protected]>; Yocto-mailing-list <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [yocto] Writing a BSP from downstream kernel sources
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just to close this: it seems like the gcc-cross-arm used by yocto
>>> gatesgarth is too new for that specific downstream kernel (3.18.31).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The goal was to get a proper BSP package for this device for a modern
>>> yocto, so I don't think I will try with an older version of Yocto. If I
>>> compile an old gcc as part of a custom Yocto layer (on gatesgarth), I am
>>> guessing that I will have issues creating a distro that runs both on RPi
>>> and on that older device (because RPi will have a newer kernel and gcc, and
>>> the skycontroller will use older ones). I also guess that the downstream
>>> dts won't work with a modern kernel, and I would not know how to write one
>>> myself for that apq8009 chip.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hence, I'm giving up. Thanks a lot for the help :-).
>>>
>>> *[Diego Santa Cruz] Wait! **You may be able to get it working, see
>>> below.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jonas Vautherin via
>>> lists.yoctoproject.org <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the answer!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems like using `KCONFIG_MODE = "--alldefconfig"` with
>>> `KBUILD_DEFCONFIG = "msm8909_defconfig"` now ends up with the same kind of
>>> errors as when I use the defconfig from the downstream kernel [1], i.e.:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *[Diego Santa Cruz] I happen to be doing a similar kind of work, getting
>>> an even older (2.6.37+) downstream kernel for an ARM machine to compile
>>> with recent GCC in Yocto, in my case GCC 9.3 from dunfell. There are a few
>>> fixes and backports necessary to make it happen and boot. I’m not done with
>>> the work yet, so I do not know how stable it is, but I have it booting.*
>>>
>>> ```
>>>
>>> | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s: Assembler messages:
>>> | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:985: Error: .err encountered
>>>
>>> ```
>>>
>>> *[Diego Santa Cruz] The fix here is rather simple once you understand
>>> what’s going on, the problem is abusive use of const for register
>>> variables, see
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.3.0/gcc/Local-Register-Variables.html
>>> <https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.3.0/gcc/Local-Register-Variables.html>
>>> so when put_user() is used for a literal constant value it gets assigned
>>> the wrong register, so just remove the const qualifier from the put_user()
>>> register variable assignment for the value argument. For my older kernel
>>> the patch is like this.*
>>>
>>> --- arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>>
>>> +++ arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>>
>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
>>>
>>>  #define
>>> put_user(x,p)
>>> \
>>>
>>>
>>> ({
>>> \
>>>
>>> -                               register const typeof(*(p)) __r2
>>> asm("r2") = (x); \
>>>
>>> +                              register typeof(*(p)) __r2 asm("r2") =
>>> (x);                             \
>>>
>>>                                 register const typeof(*(p)) __user *__p
>>> asm("r0") = (p);\
>>>
>>>                                 register int __e
>>> asm("r0");                                                           \
>>>
>>>                         switch (sizeof(*(__p)))
>>> {                                                \
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Could it be related to the tuning, e.g. I'm somehow defining a wrong
>>> toolchain in my machine configuration [2] and it fails to build? I was
>>> thinking about the tune-cortexa7.inc include, though it seems to me that
>>> the apq8009 is a cortexa7 [3]:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *[Diego Santa Cruz] Other commits from post 3.18 that you may need to
>>> backport are the following (start from bottom of list) *
>>>
>>> 474c90156c8dcc2fa815e6716cc9394d7930cb9c give up on gcc ilog2() constant
>>> optimizations
>>>
>>> cb984d101b30eb7478d32df56a0023e4603cba7f compiler-gcc: integrate the
>>> various compiler-gcc[345].h files
>>>
>>> f6d133f877c8bb0a0934dc8c521c758ee771e901 compiler-gcc.h: neatening
>>>
>>> 7829fb09a2b4268b30dd9bc782fa5ebee278b137 lib: make memzero_explicit more
>>> robust against dead store elimination
>>>
>>> cb4188ac8e5779f66b9f55888ac2c75b391cde44 compiler: introduce
>>> __alias(symbol) shortcut
>>>
>>> 0b053c9518292705736329a8fe20ef4686ffc8e9 lib: memzero_explicit: use
>>> barrier instead of OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR
>>>
>>> ee91ef6173e81819f5ff610c2485802081635657 bufferhead: force inlining of
>>> buffer head flag operations
>>>
>>> cc7fce80229067890365c1ee196be5d304d36dea mtd: blkdevs: fix switch-bool
>>> compilation warning
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > The Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 is an entry level SoC for Android
>>> based tablets and smartphones. It contains four ARM Cortex-A7 CPU cores
>>> (quad core)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://github.com/parrot-opensource/skycontroller3-opensource/blob/master/sources/linux-3.18.31/linux.config
>>>
>>> [2]:
>>> https://github.com/JonasVautherin/meta-skycontroller3/blob/main/conf/machine/skycontroller3.conf#L32
>>>
>>> [3]:
>>> https://www.notebookcheck.net/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-212-APQ8009-SoC-Benchmarks-and-Specs.169859.0.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:06 AM Paul Barker <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 02:29, Jonas Vautherin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > As a learning experience, I am trying to create a BSP for a device I
>>> own and whose downstream kernel is published. The device in question is the
>>> Parrot Skycontroller3, and the sources are available here.
>>> >
>>> > Let me start by sharing my issue. When I build the kernel with
>>> `bitbake virtual/kernel`, it fails with errors like:
>>> >
>>> > ```
>>> > |   AS      arch/arm/lib/backtrace.o
>>> > |   AS      arch/arm/lib/bswapsdi2.o
>>> > |   AS      arch/arm/lib/call_with_stack.o
>>> > | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s: Assembler messages:
>>> > | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:985: Error: .err encountered
>>> > | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:1033: Error: .err encountered
>>> > | /tmp/ccz8jKgm.s:6812: Error: .err encountered
>>> > ```
>>> >
>>> > My layer is available here.
>>> >
>>> > I created it getting inspiration from meta-raspberrypi and
>>> meta-qti-bsp, which seems to have the same CPU: apq8009. According to the
>>> Parrot sources, my device runs a Qualcomm apq8009/msm89090 cpu. In my repo,
>>> I use as a defconfig file the linux.config that is available in the Parrot
>>> sources (I copied it in my kernel recipe under `files/defconfig` and added
>>> it to SRC_URI).
>>> >
>>> > The Parrot sources also refer to `LINUX_DEFAULT_CONFIG_TARGET :=
>>> msm8909_defconfig`, so I tried to set `KBUILD_DEFCONFIG =
>>> "msm8909_defconfig"`, but that is failing with different errors, such as:
>>> >
>>> > ```
>>> > error: 'VM_ARM_DMA_CONSISTENT' undeclared (first use in this
>>> function); did you mean 'DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT'?
>>> > ```
>>> >
>>> > or
>>> >
>>> > ```
>>> > error: 'L_PTE_YOUNG' undeclared
>>> > ```
>>> >
>>> > As a side note, their `drivers/Kconfig` seemed invalid, so I patched
>>> it.
>>> >
>>> > I am a bit lost now, not completely sure where my issues come from. I
>>> realize that changing the defconfig has quite some impact (I get different
>>> errors), and also that my machine configuration may be completely wrong (I
>>> am essentially guessing from the fact that it is an apq8009/msm8909, but
>>> for instance the tuning I just copied from meta-qti-bsp, which may be
>>> invalid).
>>> >
>>> > I would be glad if I could get hints about debugging this. Again, it
>>> is really a learning project: I would like to learn how to create a BSP
>>> from a downstream kernel.
>>>
>>> I think setting `KBUILD_DEFCONFIG = "msm8909_defconfig"` is likely the
>>> correct approach here. What you may be missing though is the correct
>>> value for KCONFIG_MODE. By default, the supplied defconfig file is
>>> copied to .config but dependencies between config options aren't
>>> resolved. You need to set `KCONFIG_MODE = "--alldefconfig"` to get the
>>> equivalent of `make msm8909_defconfig` to occur. See
>>>
>>> https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi/blob/master/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi.inc#L19
>>> for an idea of how this is done for Raspberry Pi.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Barker
>>> Konsulko Group
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Diego Santa Cruz, PhD *Technology Architect
>>> spinetix.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#52165): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/52165
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/80047657/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to