On Thu, 6 May 2021, 13:44 Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:57 AM Thomas Hill via lists.yoctoproject.org > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Martin!
> > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 02:28 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > https://github.com/webOS-ports/meta-webos-ports/commit/9fd17a67cdbed92df13a14b002a189b4c6c2d442 > > > is an example where it triggers this error, but doesn't trigger the more > > > common host-user-contaminated QA error (unless you happened to use UID > > > 1001 on host for the user running bitbake). > I have here a similar problem with one of my own packages. It happens that > my bitbake user uses UID 1001. Do you have more information why this is a > problem? Should it be enough to change the UID to 1002 to get everything > running? > No, you should chown the files to be owned by the expected user which exists > in the image (probably root like in my commit). Changing the UID of the user > on host is very bad work around (as it will fail for the next person building > the same image with host user 1001. Ok. Thanks. I can confirm that the change of the bitbake users UID to 1111 did not solve the issue. I will open a new thread because I don't see why this fails. I use oe_runmake in my do_install function and got the impression that oe_runmake should take care of this via fakeroot. Tom
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#53414): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/53414 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/78301741/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
