On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 11:29 AM Luiz Balloti <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm not a Yocto/bitbake expert, so please forgive me for the > possibily confusing message. > > Our current Yocto setup uses sumo (we're stuck with that right now, don't > know if it matters). It has one shared layer, an ARM layer with one machine > and a "x86" layer with two 32-bit machines. A few recipes in shared our > layer use a "x86" override to restrict functionality to these machines > (bbappends were causing trouble, so I went the override route). > > We now have a requirement to migrate one of the x86-32 machines to a > 64-bit system. My first step was to use "genericx86-64" as a test machine > and inspect a few variables. I was surprised to find out that > MACHINEOVERRIDES does not list "x86" anymore, just the machine's name. I'd > expect that a common override for x86 machines would be defined, regardless > of the bitness, but repeating this with "genericx86" tells me this is not > the case. We have meta-intel, but it seems our x86 machine variables come > from meta-yocto-bsp (I wonder now if this is a layer priority issue). > > Is this not a common use case or is our setup fundamentally wrong? x86 is for 32 bit intel arch you won’t see It in pure 64bit machines > > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#54989): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/54989 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/86152549/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
