On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 14:59 +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > Peter, Ross > > On 1/19/22 1:56 PM, Peter Bergin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2022-01-19 13:16, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I reused a simple "hello" recipe and added a non-matching checksum to > > > it: > > > > > > ... > > > SRC_URI = "file://helloworld.c" > > > SRC_URI[md5sum] = "34f0efd76b4f18888888888833cdd129" > > > ... > > > > > > The rest of the recipe comes from > > > https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta-skeleton/recipes-skeleton/hello-single. > > > > > > > > > Why doesn't Bitbake stop, reporting that the checksum doesn't match the > > > source file? > > > Anyway, why does the recipe build without a checksum? Shouldn't > > > checksums be mandatory? > > > > No they are not mandatory for all fetchers. They are only used for > > content downloaded from non-local archives. > > https://docs.yoctoproject.org/bitbake/bitbake-user-manual/bitbake-user-manual-fetching.html#the-download-fetch > > > > > > https://github.com/openembedded/bitbake/blob/32180d5057c818a69987aada482e82acf3c72ef2/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py#L1268 > > > > > > ^^ here you can see the selection of URI's that automatically needs a > > checksum. > > > Thanks for your replies. This all makes perfect sense then.
Personally, I think where the checksums are present, we should check them regardless of url type though. I think I have an open bug related to this and the uninative fetching. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#55922): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/55922 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/88532562/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
