On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:25 AM <adrian.du...@keyfactor.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 01:13 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Jumping on this thread to provide some clarifications as I hit the same
> bug.
> I can confirm that this is not an environment issue. I could reproduce it
> by adding a sudo call in an empty recipe like this:
>
> SUMMARY = ""
> HOMEPAGE = ""
> LICENSE = ""
> SECTION = ""
> DEPENDS = ""
>
> SRC_URI = ""
>
> do_install() {
> ls -l /usr/bin/sudo
> sudo ls -l /usr/bin/sudo
> }
>
Build already use a fake root environment using pseudo to intercept the
calls so this might not be out of line here. What is the original issue you
are running into ?
>
> Running bitbake barebone on my x86 machine produces this error:
>
> | -rwxr-xr-x 1 nobody 65534 232416 Mar 1 13:59 /usr/bin/sudo
> | sudo: /etc/sudo.conf is owned by uid 65534, should be 0
> | sudo: /etc/sudo.conf is owned by uid 65534, should be 0
> | sudo: error in /etc/sudo.conf, line 0 while loading plugin
> "sudoers_policy"
> | sudo: /usr/libexec/sudo/sudoers.so must be owned by uid 0
> | sudo: fatal error, unable to load plugins
>
> Indeed it seems that ownership is broken somehow in the bb environment.
> The issue was introduced somewhere between dunfell and kirkstone. I know
> it's a large timespan but it's a bit time consuming to narrow it down.
>
> Hoping to get some help on this. I would try to investigate further myself
> but I have no idea where to start to be honest.
>
> Best regards,
> --Adrian
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#59600): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/59600
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/96733939/21656
Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
