On 10-11-08 7:41 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:[email protected]]Out of curiosity. What's the logic/requirement behind this change ? Since we don't have a 'supported' 2.6.36 kernel, using these would be a mismatch with what is actually booting on the targets. There's probably something I just don't understand here, so apologies in advance for the (potentially) dumb question. Cheers, Bruce Bruce, AFAIU the linux-libc-headers are independent from the running kernel. These are headers for libc.
But they aren't. The libc headers should be coupled to the kernel version. New ABIs are established and glibc can detect and deal with this, but you should never have a newer set of headers than the running kernel. To say the least, I'd like more explanation of this change. Bruce
Thanks, Nitin
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
