On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:40 +0800, Ke, Liping wrote: > Thanks for the detailed design guide. I will sync up with Jessica and redo > the patch. > > And thanks for advice of the namedtuple usage. During the implementation, > we did tried several ways of inheritance refactory, but all failed with > nametuple static attributes. > And when trying to change it to dict, I found too much code need to be > modified, and I was very upset and gave up...
For reference its taken me a lot longer than I expected to be able to reply to this with code ideas that I'm happy should work for this implementation and let this code function in a way I'm happy about from an overall architecture perspective. Its a tricky problem. > I am now basically clear about your comments. If meeting detailed problem > when implementation, I will let you know. > > And Jessica, so could you make some schedule adjustment? I guess I need some > time to finish this refactory. One other thing we need to keep in mind memory usage. The previous implementation was designed to be light on memory use and we need to try and ensure this one is too. I've not looked at numbers for this at all at this point. This is particularly true for OpenEmbedded which has a lot more recipes that we have in OE-Core. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
